Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 51 papers

Another 321papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. OtherarXiv 2610.13912

    RSI-Anything: Unlocking Recursive Self-Improvement with World Models

    Proposes RSI-Anything, which uses a world model to select candidates and retain policy updates.

    Published
    Evaluated models
    ReasonFlux-Coder-7B, 4B policy, W1
    AbstractRSI-Anything integrates world models into recursive self-improvement through prediction, feedback, and retention checks, and reports gains across multiple domains.

    RSI-Anything is a cross-domain framework: it uses world model predictions to decide which candidates to take external feedback for, then uses the feedback to decide whether the policy, workflow, or predictor is updated, and uses checks to decide which pair is retained. The difficulty to address is the limited interaction budget, and the fact that once the policy changes, the candidate distribution faced by the predictor also changes. The authors argue that improving only one side does not guarantee that the assembled system will be better.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2610.11754

    仅凭输出审查无法验证什么:面向研究智能体的研究契约

    提出研究合同,把已批准选择绑定到执行证据并由检查器核验

    Published
    Evaluated models
    OpenAI gpt-5.6-sol, OpenAI gpt-5.6-terra, OpenAI gpt-5.6-luna and others18
    Abstract研究合同暴露四类输出单独建不立的关系。

    研究合同用来核验计算科学研究智能体是否仍在已批准研究之内,不判断科学是否为真。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. OtherarXiv 2610.10064

    研究者提出理解审计机制,以缓解自动化 AI 研究带来的风险

    提出 comprehension audits,以人类理解证据作为继续研发门槛

    Published
    Abstract理解审计把出示人类理解设为继续研发的门禁,并报告开源评审评论率下降。

    本文是一份研发过程保障提案:用 comprehension audits 检验责任人是否理解 AI 参与产生的研发贡献,未达标就暂停后续开发与依赖该贡献的发布。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AutoSciBench:自动生成科学智能体评测基准的框架

    提出 AutoSciBench,循环生成科学智能体评测任务

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 5, Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Opus 4.7 and others10
    AbstractAutoSciBench 用概念、配方和求解反馈自动构造并加难科学智能体基准。

    AutoSciBench 研究科学智能体基准能否自动构造,并随 solver 行为迭代改编。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. EvalResearchBench:AI 智能体自主设计评测基准

    提出 EvalResearchBench,评测智能体自建评测对目标基准的排序一致性

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-6 Astra, GPT-5.6 Sol, GLM-5.3 and others9
    AbstractERB 比较有预算的评测设计,分数复现与排序并不由同一设计同时领先。

    ERB 用来测一件事:智能体在固定预算内做出的可执行评测,能否复现既有基准对候选模型的分数和排序。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. DefensesarXiv 2610.03089

    COBRA:为计算机使用 Agent 防御分支引导攻击的双 LLM 架构

    提出 COBRA 双 LLM 架构,防御计算机使用 Agent 的分支转向攻击

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gpt-5, UI-TARS-1.5-7B, claude-sonnet-5 and others6

    Abstract提出分支转向防御架构 COBRA,通过事前能力约束与边界代理消除分支转向攻击并兼顾效用。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. DIBench:面向移动 GUI 智能体多候选选择决策完整性的安全基准

    用 DIBench 评测移动 GUI 智能体被 UI 注入后的决策完整性

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-VL(32B), Qwen3-VL(32B), GUI-Owl(32B) and others7

    Abstract论文提出移动智能体决策完整性基准 DIBench,发现欺诈 UI 注入诱导目标选择并推高完成率,通用防御收益不稳定。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. OtherarXiv 2609.36054

    多作者论文评估 AI 研发自动化触发智能爆炸的可能与政策应对

    评估自动化 AI 研发触发智能爆炸的可能并提出政策应对

    Published
    Abstract软件驱动智能爆炸可能把数年进展压进数月,作者要求三项政策先做好。

    Chan 等论证:自动化 AI 研发可能经软件反馈环形成智能爆炸,把本需数年的进展压进数月或更短。他们关心的不是换硬件的建设周期,而是 AI 扩大有效研发劳动力、再产出更强系统,以及社会能否在能力跃迁前看见、约束并适应这一过程。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. 窄域多模态微调可诱发涌现性失配,覆盖 15 个视觉语言模型

    证明无显式危害的图文窄微调可诱发跨任务涌现未对齐

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5 and others15
    Abstract证实窄多模态微调可引发全面的多渠道未对齐行为转变,揭示了后训练阶段对齐被隐蔽重塑的安全隐患。

    论文系统探究了视觉-语言模型中由窄任务微调诱发的跨模态涌现未对齐(Emergent Misalignment, EM)现象。

    Paper analysisRead analysis