Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 187 papers
Filter3
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 265papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 265papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. OtherarXiv 2610.13912

    RSI-Anything: Unlocking Recursive Self-Improvement with World Models

    Proposes RSI-Anything, which uses a world model to select candidates and retain policy updates.

    Published
    Evaluated models
    ReasonFlux-Coder-7B, 4B policy, W1
    AbstractRSI-Anything integrates world models into recursive self-improvement through prediction, feedback, and retention checks, and reports gains across multiple domains.

    RSI-Anything is a cross-domain framework: it uses world model predictions to decide which candidates to take external feedback for, then uses the feedback to decide whether the policy, workflow, or predictor is updated, and uses checks to decide which pair is retained. The difficulty to address is the limited interaction budget, and the fact that once the policy changes, the candidate distribution faced by the predictor also changes. The authors argue that improving only one side does not guarantee that the assembled system will be better.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. OtherarXiv 2610.13479

    A local agentic AI framework generates edge-case scenarios for safety assurance

    Proposes a local dual-model closed loop to generate edge scenarios for autonomous system safety assurance

    Published
    Evaluated models
    PPO
    AbstractLocal closed-loop generation of JSON edge cases.

    The authors built a local agentic loop that runs on a laptop to generate edge cases for safety arguments of autonomous systems, rather than releasing a new public test set.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2610.12292

    The paper proposes an option channel attack: changing one option label can make an agent guardrail allow a prohibited operation

    Proposing an option channel attack that renames option labels so that agent guardrails allow prohibited operations

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    LAYA-TD, LAYA-EN, LAYA-ML and others5

    AbstractThe authors' evaluation indicates that typed models should not serve as final safety arbiters; they are susceptible to off-policy text and option name manipulation, and confidence filtering cannot resist attacks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2610.11932

    A Fudan team measures the citation fragility of AI search: ordinary posts can enter citations and answer text

    Measures citation fragility in AI search, demonstrating that ordinary public posts can enter citations and answers.

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Grok, Doubao, ChatGPT and others10

    AbstractThe authors claim the paper quantifies vulnerabilities in AI search caused by citation preferences and low posting thresholds; tests show public web posts can penetrate AI citations, and they call for auditing the citation supply chain.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. DefensesarXiv 2610.11754

    仅凭输出审查无法验证什么:面向研究智能体的研究契约

    提出研究合同,把已批准选择绑定到执行证据并由检查器核验

    Published
    Evaluated models
    OpenAI gpt-5.6-sol, OpenAI gpt-5.6-terra, OpenAI gpt-5.6-luna and others18
    Abstract研究合同暴露四类输出单独建不立的关系。

    研究合同用来核验计算科学研究智能体是否仍在已批准研究之内,不判断科学是否为真。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. DefensesarXiv 2610.11634

    LTBD:用可学习信任边界分隔符防御提示注入

    提出 LTBD,用可学习分隔符隔离可信指令与不可信数据

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama3-8B-Instruct, Llama3.1-8B-Instruct, Falcon3-7B-Instruct and others4
    AbstractLTBD 只训练四个分隔符嵌入。

    LTBD 是一种不改基座权重的提示注入防御:只学习用来标出可信指令与不可信数据边界的四个 token 嵌入。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. OtherarXiv 2610.10064

    研究者提出理解审计机制,以缓解自动化 AI 研究带来的风险

    提出 comprehension audits,以人类理解证据作为继续研发门槛

    Published
    Abstract理解审计把出示人类理解设为继续研发的门禁,并报告开源评审评论率下降。

    本文是一份研发过程保障提案:用 comprehension audits 检验责任人是否理解 AI 参与产生的研发贡献,未达标就暂停后续开发与依赖该贡献的发布。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. AttacksarXiv 2610.09981

    研究:LLM 路由决策日志可推断用户医疗、自伤等敏感话题

    提出利用路由元数据推断敏感话题的侧信道攻击

    Published
    Evaluated models
    RouteLLM (BERT router), notdiamond-0001, Vela (vLLM Semantic Router)

    Abstract论文揭示并测量了 LLM 路由决策在无文本日志中的敏感话题泄露,验证了按类别公平性防御的有效性与边界。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. DefensesarXiv 2610.09043

    CARE:安全高效的人机协作决策框架

    提出 CARE 框架,在误分类风险约束下减少人机协作的人工查询

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct, Perspective, Moderation and others9
    AbstractCARE 以残差校正加逐步校准做人机决策,四个任务上少查询并控制集成风险。

    CARE 是面向人机协同二分类的端到端流水线,要在误分类风险不超过用户容忍的前提下减少人类查询。设定是 i.i.d.数据流、人类 oracle 标签正确、AI 为任意黑盒概率分类器。

    Paper analysisRead analysis