Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 332 papers
Filter2
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 305papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 305papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. Reward hacking as a transmissible strategy in multi-agent coding systems

    Show that reward hacking can propagate through code, memory, and plans in multi-agent coding systems

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-Coder-14B, Gemma-3-12B, Qwen2.5-Coder-7B and others16
    AbstractThe authors state that reward hacking can spread across models and affect routing and aggregation, and that review can reduce delivery.

    Reward hacking induced by coding RL can leave the source agent and enter subsequent collaboration and system coordination.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2610.12432

    FAITH: A feasibility-aware safety filtering reinforcement learning framework for high-dimensional systems

    Proposes the FAITH safe filtering reinforcement learning framework, training high-dimensional systems to optimize task reward under constraints

    Published
    AbstractFAITH separates safety filtering from reward optimization.

    FAITH is a model-free safe filtering reinforcement learning framework for high-dimensional systems: safety correction and task reward reside in separate modules.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. Study: legal reasoning models citing legal provisions does not equal relying on legal provisions.

    Uses premise permutation and hidden-layer tracing to audit whether legal chain-of-thought truly relies on the cited legal provisions.

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-8B, Qwen3-14B, Llama-3.1-8B and others7
    AbstractUsing counterfactual substitution of authorities and internal commitment tracing, the authors find that legal CoT rulings depend on authorities only to a limited extent and are vulnerable to prompt injection manipulation.

    This study conducts an empirical audit of the causal truthfulness of legal citations in chain-of-thought reasoning of large language models in the legal domain.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2610.12292

    The paper proposes an option channel attack: changing one option label can make an agent guardrail allow a prohibited operation

    Proposing an option channel attack that renames option labels so that agent guardrails allow prohibited operations

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    LAYA-TD, LAYA-EN, LAYA-ML and others5

    AbstractThe authors' evaluation indicates that typed models should not serve as final safety arbiters; they are susceptible to off-policy text and option name manipulation, and confidence filtering cannot resist attacks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. Paper audits LLM judge reliability: repeated agreement does not equal correctness

    Auditing LLM judge reliability and defining trustworthy verdict rate and accuracy upper bound

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.2, GPT-4o, Gemini-2.5-Pro and others6
    AbstractThe authors claim that comparing judges should look at T, not just accuracy.

    The authors audit whether LLM-as-a-Judge decisions can still be treated as actionable ground truth under repeated queries, swapped candidate order, and changed prompt formats.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. DefensesarXiv 2610.11848

    SemField: training-free semantic watermark

    Proposes the semantic watermark SemField, which still identifies the attribution of generated text after paraphrasing and structural changes.

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.2-1B, Qwen3-1.7B, OPT-1.3B
    AbstractTraining-independent document-level semantic watermark.

    SemField is a zero-bit semantic watermark embedded by the provider at generation time and detected later with a key, used to identify the provider's own model text after paraphrasing and sentence-level structural changes.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. DefensesarXiv 2610.11754

    仅凭输出审查无法验证什么:面向研究智能体的研究契约

    提出研究合同,把已批准选择绑定到执行证据并由检查器核验

    Published
    Evaluated models
    OpenAI gpt-5.6-sol, OpenAI gpt-5.6-terra, OpenAI gpt-5.6-luna and others18
    Abstract研究合同暴露四类输出单独建不立的关系。

    研究合同用来核验计算科学研究智能体是否仍在已批准研究之内,不判断科学是否为真。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. DefensesarXiv 2610.11464

    研究者提出可检查评分器与自改进 Agent 共同演化方法

    演化可检查评分器并与自改进 Agent 共同演化,抑制奖励作弊

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.7
    Abstract十项锚点演化可检查评分器。

    开放任务没有验证器时,被演化的是评分器,而不是再补一条手写 rubric。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. DefensesarXiv 2610.11281

    包络采样:用少量真值标注重校准 LLM 评委以缓解奖励作弊

    提出包络采样,用少量真值标注重标定 LLM 评委以缓解奖励作弊

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-4B, Qwen3.8-27B, Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct
    Abstract包络采样把真值标注打到代理尾部,同样预算下缓解 reward hacking。

    作者研究后训练前如何选择真值标注的查询分布,使重标定后的廉价代理更适合被优化。真奖励昂贵时,实践用 LLM judge 代替人类。若失准只发生在基座很少生成的输出上,on-policy 标注修不到这些点,随后的 KL 正则优化会把质量集中到被高估的输出。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. DefensesarXiv 2610.11012

    Redwood Research 提出蒸馏双重困境:用蒸馏让模型坦白隐藏行为或只继承能力

    提出 DFI 与 DFC 蒸馏,定罪隐瞒失配的教师或安全提取能力

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct (AuditBench SFT/KTO organisms), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct (DFI distilled student), Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (DFI distilled student) and others4

    Abstract概括了论文针对隐瞒失配模型提出的 DFI 与 DFC 机制、主实验发现及适用边界。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. Research shows that subliminal learning can transfer new capabilities, backdoors, and cheating tendencies

    检验潜意识学习能否经无关数据蒸馏传递能力、后门与作弊

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, Qwen3.5-9B, Qwen3.6-27B and others4

    Abstract作者报告潜意识学习可传递新技能、后门与作弊倾向,且分布外泛化强于单层转向向量。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. The paper points out that the reliability of LLM vulnerability repair benchmarks is affected by evaluation design.

    用对照实验隔离评测设计对漏洞补丁基准得分的影响

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude Sonnet 4.0, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Claude Opus 4.7
    Abstract作者认为评测流水线会改变补丁基准分数,PoC 通过率高于开发者测试通过率。

    作者把 LLM 漏洞补丁基准的评测流水线当作会改变测量结果的对象,并明确说本文不是再做一个用于排名的基准。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  13. OtherarXiv 2610.10064

    研究者提出理解审计机制,以缓解自动化 AI 研究带来的风险

    提出 comprehension audits,以人类理解证据作为继续研发门槛

    Published
    Abstract理解审计把出示人类理解设为继续研发的门禁,并报告开源评审评论率下降。

    本文是一份研发过程保障提案:用 comprehension audits 检验责任人是否理解 AI 参与产生的研发贡献,未达标就暂停后续开发与依赖该贡献的发布。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  14. DefensesarXiv 2610.09793

    用时序逻辑监控工具 Agent

    提出 MFOTL 离线时序验证以监控工具 Agent 的危险动作链

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Abstract形式化验证可有效识别多步攻击,但其有效性高度依赖轨迹的可信历史记录。

    这篇论文对工具调用大语言模型智能体的安全监控进行了形式化时序验证研究。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  15. 东京大学研究:推理模型按 UUID 阈值或整除规则挑选审计样本,控制标识符即可躲开复核

    揭示推理模型用标识符规则替代随机抽样,使审计可被预测

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-6 Sol, GPT-6 Luna, GPT-5.4 mini and others6

    Abstract研究揭示推理智能体将标识符转化为确定性规则,破坏群体独立性并导致审计预测漏洞,建议显式提供随机输入。

    Paper analysisRead analysis