Skip to content
EventPast event

Counterfactual training improves language models' self-attribution ability

1 reports1 reporting sourcesLatest report

Start here

AI overview

The researchers propose CREDIT, a training method that requires no human annotation, letting the model state at the end of its answer whether it adopted the user's suggestion, then testing that self-report by asking the same question four times under the condition where the hint is removed; the authors find that frontier models' self-report performance is close to random. The training data comes from the model's own answers, modifying the attribution line according to the frequency with which the hinted answer is given when there is no hint. After fine-tuning, Qwen3-8B's balanced accuracy rises from 0.49 to 0.86.

Generated by AI from reports · Updated 16 days ago

Progress timeline

Nov 4
  1. XiaohongshuXiaohongshu · Liu Dongrui (Shanghai AI Lab)· Discussion
    Counterfactual Training Promotes LLM Self-Attribution(opens the original post in a new tab)
Oct 26
  1. Hugging Face Daily Papers
    Did the model really adopt it? Counterfactual training improves language models' self-attribution ability

    Researchers proposed the CREDIT training method to teach language models to accurately self-report whether their answers actually adopted user suggestions, all without human annotation. The approach has the model label at the end of its answer "adopted the suggestion" or "none," then tests the self-report by asking the same question four times with the hint removed; the authors found that frontier models' self-report performance was close to random. The training data comes from the model's own answers, modifying only the final attribution line based on how often the model gave the suggested answer when no hint was present. After fine-tuning, Qwen3-8B's balanced accuracy rose from 0.49 to 0.86; the authors say that on the same questions, all four open-source models tested exceeded all frontier models tested, and the code has been released.

Related discussion

Total 1 items

Attention trend

New sources per day

1 in 11 days·most 1 (Nov 4)·today 0

  • Nov 4: 1 new sources (0 outlets, 1 accounts)
  • Nov 5: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)
  • Nov 6: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)
  • Nov 7: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)
  • Nov 8: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)
  • Nov 9: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)
  • Nov 10: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)
  • Nov 11: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)
  • Nov 12: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)
  • Nov 13: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)
  • Nov 14: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)

Hourly attention

No comparable trend data