Sakana AI's self-improving model MASS has self-blind spots
Start here
Researchers from Sakana AI and UC Berkeley proposed a multi-agent self-supervised method called MASS, where the same language model serves simultaneously as task executor, workflow optimizer, and evaluator, enabling recursive self-improvement without a stronger teacher model. Using Qwen3.6-27B as the base model, on 12 financial, robotics, and pharmaceutical research tasks generated by GPT-5.5, the win rate against the base model rose from 53.9% after one round to 69.9% after two rounds, with improvements also seen on benchmarks such as MLR-Bench, DSBench, and ScienceAgentBench. However, the report notes that while the model is stronger at solving problems and judging, it fails to catch its own blind spots.
Generated by AI from reports · Updated 21 hr ago
Progress timeline
- The DecoderSelectedSakana AI's self-improving model is stronger at solving and judging, yet cannot catch its own blind spots
Researchers at Sakana AI and UC Berkeley proposed a multi-agent self-supervision method called MASS, in which the same language model simultaneously takes on three roles—solving problems, optimizing workflows, and judging results—to achieve recursive self-improvement without a stronger teacher model. The base model is Qwen3.6-27B, and the tasks are 12 financial, robotics, and pharmaceutical research tasks generated by GPT-5.5. On the test tasks, the win rate against the base model rose from 53.9% after one round to 69.9% after two rounds; on MLR-Bench, DSBench, ScienceAgentBench, and AstaBench, the score per output token was 1.2 to 1.6 times that of the base model, but on Terminal-Bench 2.0 and SWE-bench Verified the scores dropped slightly; the agreement rate between the self-evaluator and external judges rose from 73% to 93%. The code has been released.
- Date not givenSakana AIMASS: Recursive Self-Improvement through Multi-Agent Self-Supervision
Sakana AI proposes the MASS method, having the same model serve as task executor, workflow optimizer, and evaluator simultaneously, using multi-agent self-supervision to provide training signals for recursive self-improvement. The inner loop uses evaluator feedback to search for better team workflows; the outer loop runs selected workflows with multiple random seeds, then fine-tunes the top-ranked trajectories back into shared model weights via LoRA. Starting from Qwen3.6-27B and running two rounds, external judge win rate against the base model on three held-out synthetic research tasks increased from 53.9% to 69.9%; on MLR-Bench, DSBench, ScienceAgentBench, and AstaBench, score per output token reached 1.2–1.6 times the base, but on Terminal-Bench 2.0 and SWE-bench Verified it was 0.96 times and 0.94 times, respectively.
Related discussion
Attention trend
New sources per day
- Oct 12: 2 new sources (1 outlets, 1 accounts)
- Oct 13: 1 new sources (1 outlets, 0 accounts)
- Oct 14: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)