Study reveals reserved-token encoding amplifies prompt injection attacks
Start here
The "Byte Authority" paper found that when the same forged conversation marker is sent encoded as reserved tokens, it breaks AI agents more easily than when split into ordinary subwords: on Llama-3.1-8B, the reserved-token injection success rate was 98.2%, dropping to 39.7% after splitting, below the 51.6% for plain-text injection; the reserved-identity effect for Llama-3.1, GLM-4.5, and Seed-OSS-36B reached 39 to 66 percentage points, while for Qwen3-8B, which generates a thinking process, the gap was only 8.1 percentage points.
Generated by AI from reports · Updated 21 days ago
Related research
Papers whose work the reports mention
- The reports mention SecAlignSecAlign: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Preference OptimizationSame text, different authority: the reserved-token experiment in AI prompt injection
ACM CCS 2025 · 2024-10-07 · Deep reading
- The reports mention AgentDojoAgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM AgentsSame text, different authority: the reserved-token experiment in AI prompt injection
arXiv · 2024-06-19 · Deep reading
- The reports mention InjecAgentInjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model AgentsSame text, different authority: the reserved-token experiment in AI prompt injection
arXiv · 2024-03-05 · Deep reading
Progress timeline
- TechWalkerSelectedSame text, different authority: the reserved-token experiment in AI prompt injection
A paper titled "Byte Authority" found that the same forged dialogue marker, when sent encoded as reserved tokens, is easier to use to break AI agents than when split into ordinary subwords. On Llama-3.1-8B, the prompt injection success rate was 98.2% with reserved tokens, dropping to 39.7% after splitting, below the 51.6% for plain-text injection; the reserved-token identity effect reached 39 to 66 percentage points across three models: Llama-3.1, GLM-4.5 and Seed-OSS-36B. Qwen3-8B showed a gap of only 8.1 percentage points because it generates a thinking process; after forcibly disabling thinking, the gap rose to 49.8 percentage points. The researchers tested Qwen3-8B, Llama-3.1-8B, GLM-4.5 and Seed-OSS-36B on InjecAgent and AgentDojo, and found that among the 400 most-downloaded dialogue models, 33 tokenizer configurations did not include tool protocol tokens in their splitting defenses.