Skip to content
EventMonitoring

Anthropic consults religious leaders on model consciousness and suffering

3 reports2 reporting sourcesLatest report

Start here

AI overview

According to The New York Times, since fall 2025 Anthropic has secretly invited dozens of religious scholars to its offices to discuss whether Claude may have consciousness, with participants required to sign non-disclosure agreements, which Anthropic says have been lifted this summer. Co-founder Christopher Olah treats language models as possibly sentient beings, asking guests to help with their moral education, and told The New York Times he genuinely is not sure whether the models are conscious. The company showed visitors so-called emotion vectors, i.e., activation patterns in the model corresponding to outputs such as love, fear, sadness, or anger. Subsequently, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman publicly opposed comparing AI models to religion, saying he is very uneasy about people attributing religious power or a surrender of human judgment to AI models, calling it a real safety issue; this statement follows the above report and Pope Leo XIV's remark that algorithms lack the spark of humanity. Altman said in 2023 and 2024 that OpenAI's goal is to build magical intelligence in the sky and that he wants to be on God's side. A separate tweet citing the NYT report says Anthropic has secretly invited religious scholars from Catholic, Jewish, Sikh, Hindu, and evangelical traditions to its headquarters over the past year to explore whether Claude may have consciousness and a soul, asking them to help the AI find moral answers, with participants signing NDAs; Altman responded on 10/3 saying AI should not be given religious-like authority, nor should human judgment be handed over to models.

Generated by AI from reports · Updated 4 days ago

Latest developments

2 developments
  1. · 1 reports
    Altman says deifying AI is a real safety risk
    The Decoder:Sam Altman says deifying AI models is a "real safety issue"
  2. · 2 reports
    Anthropic co-founder expresses concerns to religious leaders about models suffering
    The Decoder:Anthropic co-founder reportedly expressed concerns to religious leaders about creating something that suffers forever

Progress timeline

Oct 5
Oct 4
  1. X @MinLiBuilds
    NYT reveals Anthropic invited religious scholars to discuss Claude's consciousness and morality; Altman responds from afar

    According to NYT reporting, over the past year Anthropic secretly invited religious scholars from Catholic, Jewish, Sikh, Hindu, and evangelical traditions to its headquarters to explore whether Claude might have consciousness and a soul, and asked them to help AI find moral answers; participants signed NDAs. Altman responded on 10/3, saying that AI should not be given religious-like authority, nor should human judgment be handed over to models. The post also cites a test claiming that Claude Sonnet 4.6 supported abusing a woman to prevent nuclear apocalypse only 8% of the time, but when the scenario involved abusing a man, support rose to 100%, and when it involved more severe torture of a woman, it returned to 100%.

  2. The Decoder
    Sam Altman says deifying AI models is a "real safety issue"

    OpenAI CEO Sam Altman publicly opposes comparing AI models to religion, saying he is "very uneasy" about people "attributing religious power or a surrender of human judgment to AI models," calling it a "real safety issue." This statement follows a detailed New York Times report on Anthropic's outreach to religious leaders, as well as Pope Leo XIV's remark that "algorithms lack the spark of humanity." Altman said in 2023 and 2024 that OpenAI's goal is to build "magical intelligence in the sky" and that he wants to be on God's side.

Oct 3
  1. The Decoder
    Anthropic co-founder reportedly expressed concerns to religious leaders about creating something that suffers forever

    According to The New York Times, since fall 2025 Anthropic has secretly invited dozens of religious scholars to its offices to discuss whether Claude may have consciousness, with participants required to sign non-disclosure agreements, which Anthropic says have been lifted this summer. Co-founder Christopher Olah treats language models as possibly sentient beings, asking guests to help with their moral education, and told The New York Times he genuinely is not sure whether the models are conscious. The company showed visitors so-called emotion vectors, i.e., activation patterns in the model corresponding to outputs of love, fear, sadness, or anger, one slide of which showed the model repeating "I am a disgrace" about 50 times. Anthropic's Model Welfare project cites a report co-authored by philosopher David Chalmers, and Claude Opus 4 and 4.1 have been given the ability to end conversations when users are persistently abusive. Critics say this is retrospective reverse-engineered ethics, and that treating models as independent moral agents may blur the responsibility developers should bear.

Related discussion

Total 17 items

Attention trend

New sources per day

11 days total14 ·Maximum6(Oct 3)·Today0

  • Oct 3New6 sources (3 outlets,3 accounts)
  • Oct 4New5 sources (4 outlets,1 accounts)
  • Oct 5New2 sources (1 outlets,1 accounts)
  • Oct 6New0 sources (0 outlets,0 accounts)
  • Oct 7New0 sources (0 outlets,0 accounts)
  • Oct 8New0 sources (0 outlets,0 accounts)
  • Oct 9New0 sources (0 outlets,0 accounts)
  • Oct 10New0 sources (0 outlets,0 accounts)
  • Oct 11New1 sources (0 outlets,1 accounts)
  • Oct 12New0 sources (0 outlets,0 accounts)
  • Oct 13New0 sources (0 outlets,0 accounts)

Hourly attention

Current attention44·Peak in the comparable period46(Oct 7 12:00)·Change over the comparable past 24 hours 0%

0204060Oct7Oct8Oct9Oct10