Commentary: AI weapons systems have been deployed in real combat, algorithms decide life and death
Start here
Kenneth Roth, former Executive Director of Human Rights Watch, wrote in The Guardian that AI-enabled lethal weapons systems have been used in real combat and algorithms are deciding who lives and who dies. He said governments have been negotiating in Geneva for over a decade to curb the development of autonomous AI weapons, and that in early September this year a meeting of 128 governments adopted a report that could serve as the basis for a binding treaty, but legal teams sent by Trump and Putin joined forces to weaken it, in particular diluting the provision requiring humans to review AI-generated military targets before strikes, and the report only mentions war, not repression. The article develops its argument using Gaza as an example.
Generated by AI from reports · Updated 5 days ago
Progress timeline
- The Guardian · 人工智能Kenneth Roth: AI weapon systems have arrived, algorithms should not decide who lives and who dies
Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human Rights Watch, writes in The Guardian that AI-enabled lethal weapon systems are already being used in real combat, and algorithms are deciding who lives and who dies. He notes that governments have been negotiating in Geneva for more than a decade to stop the development of autonomous AI weapons. In early September this year, 128 governments met and adopted a report that could serve as the basis for a binding treaty, but legal teams sent by Trump and Putin worked together to weaken it, especially the provision requiring human review of AI-generated military targets before strikes. The report also only addresses war, not repression. The article cites Gaza as an example: after the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, the Israeli military used an AI system named Lavender to identify phone patterns of suspected Hamas members, and used another automated system, Where's Daddy?, to track their residences and carry out strikes, resulting in the deaths of their families as well. In theory, humans remain in the loop, but intelligence officers spend an average of only 20 seconds reviewing each target, describing themselves as merely stamping approvals, making human judgment a formality.
Related discussion
Attention trend
New sources per day
- Oct 2: 1 new sources (1 outlets, 0 accounts)
- Oct 3: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)
- Oct 4: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)
- Oct 5: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)
- Oct 6: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)
- Oct 7: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)
- Oct 8: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)
- Oct 9: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)
- Oct 10: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)
- Oct 11: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)
- Oct 12: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)
- Oct 13: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)
- Oct 14: 0 new sources (0 outlets, 0 accounts)