Study reveals subliminal learning can transfer across model pretraining conditions
Start here
A study released on October 26, 2026 examined subliminal learning—in which a student model acquires a teacher's preferences from training data that appears unrelated to the preferences—on Pythia, PolyPythia, and DataDecide OLMo models. Experiments found that preference transmission does not require the teacher and student to share initialization, pretraining data order, corpus, model scale, or architecture; among 30 cross-model pairs involving AMD-OLMo and Qwen, 26 showed positive transmission. The study also found that transmitting preferences and acquiring preferences are two capabilities that can develop separately during pretraining, with some checkpoints better at being teachers and others better at being students.
Generated by AI from reports · Updated 17 days ago
Storyline
- · 4 reports· Attention42Research: Subliminal learning can transmit new abilities, backdoors, and cheating tendencies
- · 1 reports· Attention40
Study reveals subliminal learning can transfer across model pretraining conditionsThis event
- · 1 reports· Attention40J-Lens struggles to detect preference transmission from subliminal learning teacher models
- · 4 reports· Attention43Diluting poisoned fine-tuning data instead strengthens the backdoor effect
Progress timeline
- LessWrongSelectedTracking Subliminal Learning During Pretraining
The paper studies subliminal learning in Pythia, PolyPythia, and DataDecide OLMo models, i.e., the phenomenon in which a student model acquires a teacher's preferences from training data that appears unrelated to those preferences. Experiments find that preference transmission does not require the student and teacher to share initialization, pretraining data order, corpus, model scale, or architecture; positive transmission occurred in 26 of 30 cross-model pairs involving AMD-OLMo and Qwen. Transmitting preferences and acquiring preferences are two capabilities that can develop separately during pretraining; some checkpoints are better at being teachers, others at being students. Retaining only the teacher's digit frequency distribution preserves 40–92% of the real-sequence transmission on Pythia and 5–36% on OLMo; under a soft-label setting, computing loss only over the teacher's top-5 tokens can even double transmission, while removing animal-name tokens greatly reduces transmission. The authors accordingly caution that when distilling capabilities across models, one must also monitor whether the student learns undesirable traits via unrelated data.