Lasso Benchmark Compares Jev with Prompt Injection Classifiers
Start here
Lasso Security tested prompt injection classifiers against 3,669 public benchmark attacks. At a 0.25% false positive rate threshold, its proprietary classifier recalls 95.4%, TypeSafe's Jev 76.2%, and PIGuard and fine-tuned Laya about 30%. Jev recalls 99.8% on explicit override-style attacks, but only 63.4% on 2,383 injections with no override wording.
Generated by AI from reports · Updated 29 days ago
Related research
Papers whose work the reports mention
- The reports mention LLMail-InjectLLMail-Inject: A Dataset from a Realistic Adaptive Prompt Injection ChallengeLasso vs. Jev: Can Jev really replace prompt injection classifiers?
arXiv · 2025-06-11 · Deep reading
- The reports mention InjecAgentInjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model AgentsLasso vs. Jev: Can Jev really replace prompt injection classifiers?
arXiv · 2024-03-05 · Deep reading
Progress timeline
- Lasso SecurityLasso vs. Jev: Can Jev really replace prompt injection classifiers?
Lasso tested prompt injection classifiers on 3,669 public benchmark attacks: at a 0.25% false positive rate, its own classifier recalls 95.4%, TypeSafe's Jev 76.2%, and PIGuard and fine-tuned Laya about 30%. Jev recalls 99.8% on explicit override attacks but only 63.4% on 2,383 injections without override wording.