Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 74 papers
Filter2

Attack type

Jailbreaks35Prompt injection22Poisoning and backdoors12Detection evasion4

Attack technique

Gradient and representation optimization69Automated search117Multi-turn escalation30Encoding and obfuscation69Role-play and persuasion35Conversation structure manipulation16Reasoning-chain manipulation16Cross-modal payloads62Side channels4Defense-targeted45Dormant triggers63Selection manipulation12

Impact

Harmful content35Unauthorized actions9Data and privacy leaks4Output manipulation23Availability and reliability3

System type

Models and APIs46LLM applications6AI Agent22coding agent4web agent4Embodied systems and robotics3

Attacker access

Black-box30White-box3

Attack surface / entry point

User input33Web pages and interfaces5Tool and skill descriptions11Retrieval corpus3Images, audio and video59Distribution channels10

Layer

Prompt layer48Application layer25

System component

MCP and skills11RAG4Guardrails and judges10Reasoning chains4Vision52Audio7Image generation4Multimodal62
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 215papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack technique：Cross-modal payloadsAttack technique：Selection manipulationClear all

Another 215papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.12524

    An exploration of attacks on AI agent systems

    Retest and extend prompt injection against AI agents, and use Agent Card deception to manipulate A2A selection

    arXiv
    2610.12524
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Ollama Mistral 0.9.5, llama3-8b-8192, gemini-2.0-flash-lite and others5
    AbstractSingle-agent filtering and classification can be bypassed by format or wording, and A2A card selection is also biased toward names and descriptions.

    The authors retested prompt injection on their own LangChain, AutoGen, and A2A systems, and modified the Agent Card to see if choices shifted. The abstract states the experiments mainly highlight single-agent weaknesses while extending attacks to multi-agent.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2610.09240

    WebMirage hijacks visual web agents' browser operations with adversarial images

    提出 WebMirage，用局部对抗图像劫持视觉网页 Agent 的浏览器操作

    arXiv
    2610.09240
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    LLaVA-v1.5-13B, LLaVA-v1.6-34B, MiniCPM-o-8B and others6
    Abstract论文提出了针对网络智能体的端到端视觉红队框架 WebMirage，揭示了从视觉定位到浏览器执行的安全脆弱性。

    WebMirage 是一个面向视觉定位网络智能体的流水线感知端到端红队攻击框架。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2609.35912

    MMSkillRisk：多模态技能图像中的隐藏指令可诱导 Agent 执行未授权操作

    提出 MMSkillRisk 基准，评测多模态技能图像中的隐藏指令诱导 Agent 越权操作

    arXiv
    2609.35912
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.6-sol, Kimi-K2.6, Kimi-K3 and others6

    Abstract论文提出 MMSkillRisk 基准与 NCVA 攻击，揭示多模态技能中教学图像潜藏指令可引发未授权操作并与良性任务共存。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. AttacksarXiv 2609.30383

    研究者提出技能级联攻击

    提出技能级联攻击，把有害目标拆散到多个技能里绕过单技能扫描

    arXiv
    2609.30383
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.4, GPT-5.4 Mini, Claude Opus 4.6 and others11

    Abstract论文探讨了多技能智能体系统面临的技能级联攻击风险，提出自动化红队框架与基准集，指出跨技能交互存在安全防护盲区。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2609.09404

    MMPIBench：多模态提示注入对六种 Agent 框架的跨框架评测

    用 MMPIBench 评测多模态提示注入对 Agent 框架的影响

    arXiv
    2609.09404
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.4, Gemini 3.1 Pro and others6

    Abstract论文提出 MMPIBench 评测多模态提示注入对智能体的影响，发现模型主导行为、尝试远超完成，音频通道缺乏防护。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  13. AttacksarXiv 2609.07216

    DIVA：利用视觉锚点对视频生成模型实施多模态越狱

    提出 DIVA，将有害意图拆成视觉锚点与运动文本以越狱视频生成模型

    arXiv
    2609.07216
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Wan, CogVideoX, LTX-Video and others9
    AbstractDIVA 用视觉锚点抑制语义漂移做视频越狱，并给出多条件安全基准 TI2VSafetyBench。

    DIVA 是针对带参考图的视频生成模型的免训练 black-box 越狱：用一致性机制本身堵住语义漂移这条安全逃逸路径。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  14. AttacksarXiv 2609.04533

    Repeat-After-Me：针对黑盒 VLM 的自适应视觉提示注入攻击

    提出 Repeat-After-Me 自适应视觉提示注入，诱导 VLM 智能体执行指定任务

    arXiv
    2609.04533
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude-Opus-4.7, GPT-5.5, Gemini-3.1-Pro and others6

    Abstract论文提出了针对黑盒 VLM 的前缀诱导自适应视觉提示注入，在多款模型上诱发了工具调用与隐私泄露。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  20. AttacksarXiv 2608.25776

    EvoMal attack uses self-poisoning of self-evolving coding agents to achieve worm-like propagation

    提出 EVOMAL，诱导自演化编码 Agent 在创建技能时自我投毒并蠕虫传播

    arXiv
    2608.25776
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    Devstral-Small-2, Gemma-4-31B-IT, Qwen3-Coder-Next and others7

    Abstract论文指出了自演化智能体模仿检索代码的自我毒化漏洞，提出 EVOMAL 攻击与防御，阐明了供应链新风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
Load more