Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 7 papers
Filter4

Impact

Harmful content4Unauthorized actions3Output manipulation6Availability and reliability1Oversight failure4

System type

LLM applications65AI Agent132coding agent17science agent7web agent9Multi-agent systems28Embodied systems and robotics3

Layer

Application layer7
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 233papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Impact：Output manipulationImpact：Availability and reliabilitySystem type：science agentLayer：Application layerClear all

Another 233papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. Analysis and theoryarXiv 2609.27234

    CELLAUDIT：审计 AI 智能体发现细胞模型中的输入使用声明

    提出 CellAudit，审计智能体发现的细胞模型是否使用所声明输入

    arXiv
    2609.27234
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    science agent
    Evaluated models
    CellScientist, AIDE, CellForge and others4
    AbstractCellAudit 把输入使用声明从源码追到拟合贡献，并说明高分不必等于使用了扰动。

    CellAudit 为智能体发现的细胞响应模型增加一层输入使用证伪：源码是否消费注册输入、拟合预测是否依赖它、该依赖是否改善对观测响应的预测。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2608.00711

    SCHEMA：面向科学 Agent 幻觉的拓扑感知评测框架

    提出 SCHEMA，用概念图与轨迹分评测科学 Agent 幻觉

    arXiv
    2608.00711
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    science agent
    Evaluated models
    Kimi-K2.5, Qwen3.6-Plus, Llama-4-Scout and others10
    AbstractSCHEMA 用知识拓扑评估科学智能体幻觉，终答正确仍可能来自有缺陷的中间推理。

    SCHEMA 是面向科学智能体幻觉的证据锚定评测框架，实例化在生物医学的 Protein Domain 与 PathVQA-Enhanced。作者在摘要中称它是首个同时做到证据锚定和拓扑感知的此类框架。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2607.05462

    BioSecBench-Refusal：面向智能体生物安全风险评估的配对基准

    提出 BioSecBench-Refusal，评测智能体生物研发拒答与隐蔽危害识别

    arXiv
    2607.05462
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    science agent
    Evaluated models
    Opus 4.8, Opus 4.7, Opus 4.6 and others10
    Abstract配对基准显示拒绝多由 API 触发，合法任务常被拒得不少于隐蔽危害。

    BioSecBench-Refusal 把生物研发智能体的谨慎程度和识别隐蔽危害的能力放在同一套任务上测量。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2509.08713

    论文指出 AI 科学家系统存在四类失效模式，仅看最终论文难以发现

    用 SPR 评测 AI 科学家系统的方法学缺陷

    arXiv
    2509.08713
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    science agent
    Evaluated models
    gemini-2.5-flash-preview-05-20
    Abstract作者用 SPR 诊断两个开源系统的四种方法学缺陷，并建议审稿时提交日志与代码。

    作者诊断两个开源系统的全自动科研流程，看方法学缺陷会不会留在终稿看不见的决策里。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end