Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 8 papers
Filter5
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 213papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 213papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.11932

    A Fudan team measures the citation fragility of AI search: ordinary posts can enter citations and answer text

    Measures citation fragility in AI search, demonstrating that ordinary public posts can enter citations and answers.

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Grok, Doubao, ChatGPT and others10

    AbstractThe authors claim the paper quantifies vulnerabilities in AI search caused by citation preferences and low posting thresholds; tests show public web posts can penetrate AI citations, and they call for auditing the citation supply chain.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2609.02774

    CodePoisonRAG:针对检索增强代码生成的知识投毒攻击

    提出 CodePoisonRAG,对检索增强代码生成的知识库投毒以植入漏洞

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen 3.5 9B, Code Llama 13B, DeepSeek-Coder-V2 16B

    AbstractCodePoisonRAG 展示了 RACG 外部知识库的新攻击面,在较低投毒率下可定向诱发指定漏洞并部分抵御防御。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. Counter-GEO-Bench:现有护栏难挡 GEO 虚假信息

    构建 COUNTER-GEO-BENCH,评测生成式搜索中的 GEO 虚假信息防御

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Gemma-4-31B-IT, Qwen-3.5-35B-A3B, Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E and others8

    Abstract论文构建了针对 GEO 虚假信息的首个防御基准,揭示通用护栏的失效与反作用,并提出了有效的轻量对比检测基线。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2608.04565

    Researchers propose Breadcrumbing long-range attack that can hijack the evidence chain of DeepResearch-style search agents

    提出权威链劫持与轨迹引导策略演化,劫持搜索 Agent 的证据链

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3.5-9B, Gemma4-31B, DeepResearch and others7

    Abstract论文揭示了多步搜索智能体在受限中间人操纵下的脆弱性,提出 ACH 策略与 TGSE 演化方法并完成系统验证。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2603.17239

    LAAF: A Systematic Red-Teaming Method and Automated Attack Framework for LPCI Vulnerabilities in Agentic LLM Systems

    Proposes LAAF, which automatically attacks LPCI vulnerabilities in agent systems in stages

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gemini-2.0-flash-001, claude-3-haiku-20240307, meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct and others5
    AbstractLAAF does LPCI red teaming with taxonomy plus stage seeding.

    The authors state that LAAF is an automated red-teaming framework built specifically for LPCI in agentic LLMs. The issue to address is that encoded, delayed, and conditionally triggered payloads can persist in memory or RAG and re-enter across sessions, whereas Garak and PyRIT do not use the previous round's breakthrough results to seed the next stage across the six stages.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2602.15654

    Zombie Agent: Persistent Control of Self-Evolving LLM Agents via Self-Reinforcing Injection

    提出 Zombie Agent 攻击,经网页间接注入将载荷写入长期记忆并跨会话触发

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Gemini-2.5-Flash, GLM-4.7-Flash
    Abstract记忆写入把一次网页间接注入变成跨会话控制。

    Zombie Agent 把自进化 LLM 智能体的跨会话记忆当成攻击面:攻击者只发布网页,良性任务读入后,正常记忆更新留下载荷,并在以后无关会话里触发未授权工具行为。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2507.10457

    论文提出 LPCI:针对 Agent 逻辑层与持久记忆的提示控制注入攻击

    提出 LPCI,把延迟条件载荷写入记忆与检索库以跨会话触发

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    ChatGPT, Claude, LLaMA3 and others8
    Abstract作者定义 LPCI。

    作者把LPCI定义为针对智能体逻辑执行、记忆留存和工具集成的跨阶段漏洞类,而不是单次输入上的提示改写。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end