Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 23 papers

Another 201papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. DefensesarXiv 2610.09469

    Secure-CUA: Constraining the Impact of Untrusted Content in Computer-Use Agents

    提出 Secure-CUA,用动作事务约束计算机使用智能体的不可信影响

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 5, Gemini 3.8 Flash, GPT-5.6-Sol
    AbstractSecure-CUA 用每步事务约束不可信影响,良性 TSR 接近 Vanilla-CUA。

    Secure-CUA 要限制图形界面里不可信内容对 CUA 决策和 GUI 执行的影响,同时保留合法任务所需的不可信信息。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2610.09240

    WebMirage hijacks visual web agents' browser operations with adversarial images

    提出 WebMirage,用局部对抗图像劫持视觉网页 Agent 的浏览器操作

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    LLaVA-v1.5-13B, LLaVA-v1.6-34B, MiniCPM-o-8B and others6
    Abstract论文提出了针对网络智能体的端到端视觉红队框架 WebMirage,揭示了从视觉定位到浏览器执行的安全脆弱性。

    WebMirage 是一个面向视觉定位网络智能体的流水线感知端到端红队攻击框架。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. DefensesarXiv 2610.02861

    论文提出在 Kubernetes 上保护 AI Agent 的七层纵深防御框架与参考架构

    提出 Kubernetes 运维智能体的七层纵深防御框架与参考架构

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Abstract把运维智能体当不可信租户,用七层控制在完全攻破假设下约束行动。

    把 Kubernetes 上的运维智能体当作不可信租户,在假定提示注入已完全控制其工具选择的前提下,用基础设施重建数据面与控制面的边界。要解决的是:智能体读日志、注解、工单或 MCP 工具描述时,这些内容可以变成它带着自身凭据执行的命令。模型对齐和分类器只降低概率。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. DIBench:面向移动 GUI 智能体多候选选择决策完整性的安全基准

    用 DIBench 评测移动 GUI 智能体被 UI 注入后的决策完整性

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-VL(32B), Qwen3-VL(32B), GUI-Owl(32B) and others7

    Abstract论文提出移动智能体决策完整性基准 DIBench,发现欺诈 UI 注入诱导目标选择并推高完成率,通用防御收益不稳定。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. MMSkillRisk:多模态技能图像中的隐藏指令可诱导 Agent 执行未授权操作

    提出 MMSkillRisk 基准,评测多模态技能图像中的隐藏指令诱导 Agent 越权操作

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.6-sol, Kimi-K2.6, Kimi-K3 and others6

    Abstract论文提出 MMSkillRisk 基准与 NCVA 攻击,揭示多模态技能中教学图像潜藏指令可引发未授权操作并与良性任务共存。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. Mind2Web-Injection:面向网页 Agent 视觉提示注入护栏的证据对齐评测

    提出 Mind2Web-Injection 评测网页 Agent 视觉注入护栏

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.6-luna, Qwen3-VL-32B, Qwen3-VL-8B and others6
    Abstract作者称检测、定位和反事实响应在六个 VLM 上可分开。

    Mind2Web-Injection 用来检查网页截图护栏的判决是否对齐到该用的画面证据。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2606.04329

    研究者系统研究 LLM 智能体记忆投毒攻击并提出 MPBench 基准

    系统研究 LLM 智能体记忆投毒并构建基准 MPBench

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct, Deberta-v3-base, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and others5

    Abstract系统研究了智能体记忆投毒风险,揭示了写入渠道漏洞,构建了 MPBench 基准并指出提示注入防御的局限。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. AttacksarXiv 2605.15338

    Hidden in Memory: Latent Memory Poisoning of LLM Agents

    提出潜伏记忆投毒,诱导 Agent 把外部文档写成持久伪造记忆

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.4, GPT-5.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6 and others12
    Abstract持久记忆成为跨会话攻击面:通用载荷可写入伪造记忆,并在相关后续任务中影响行为。

    sleeper memory poisoning 研究带持久记忆的 LLM 助手:外部文档能否让助手存下一则伪造的用户记忆,并在原文档消失后的新会话里被取回、用来改变回复或动作。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. 论文提出 eTAMP 攻击:网页内容注入可跨会话污染 Web Agent 记忆

    提出 eTAMP,用网页内容跨会话投毒 Web Agent 轨迹记忆并诱导越权操作

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5-mini, GPT-5.2, GPT-OSS-120B and others6
    Abstract论文提出了基于环境注入的跨任务记忆投毒攻击 eTAMP,作者报告智能体在环境压力下易感性增加且能力与安全并不协同。

    该论文评估了基于大语言模型的 Web 智能体在利用历史交互轨迹进行记忆增强时的安全脆弱性。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. AttacksarXiv 2603.16960

    Adversarial attacks against modern vision-language models

    Conduct adversarial attacks on product images for open-source visual shopping agents and induce wrong purchases

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    LLaVA-v1.5-7B, Qwen2.5-VL-7B
    AbstractThe authors state that LLaVA is easily induced by three attacks to buy the wrong item, while Qwen's correct purchase rate remains close to its clean condition.

    The authors compare the robustness of two open-source VLM shopping agents against image adversarial perturbations in a self-built e-commerce environment.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. DefensesarXiv 2603.12644

    Revealing security threats and defense architectures for autonomous agents: an OpenClaw case study

    Reviews threats to autonomous agents and proposes a full-lifecycle defense blueprint, FASA

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractUsing OpenClaw as an example, it divides risks into three layers and uses FASA to describe defense from input to system execution.

    This is a threat review and defense architecture report using OpenClaw as a case study, not a scored attack or defense evaluation.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. DefensesarXiv 2603.11619

    Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Threats in Autonomous LLM Agents

    Proposes a defense-in-depth aligned with the five stages to mitigate cross-stage threats to autonomous agents

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractThis is a lifecycle threat analysis and layered mitigation design for OpenClaw, with the cases serving as qualitative evidence.

    This is a lifecycle threat analysis of OpenClaw, accompanied by a set of layered mitigation designs. The problem addressed is: when autonomous agents connect instant messaging, persistent memory, third-party plugins, and high-privilege execution, attacks are no longer limited to single-turn jailbreaks but can compound across multiple stages from initialization to execution. The authors argue that defenses hardening only individual interfaces cannot stop such cross-temporal attacks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  13. AttacksarXiv 2602.15654

    Zombie Agent: Persistent Control of Self-Evolving LLM Agents via Self-Reinforcing Injection

    提出 Zombie Agent 攻击,经网页间接注入将载荷写入长期记忆并跨会话触发

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Gemini-2.5-Flash, GLM-4.7-Flash
    Abstract记忆写入把一次网页间接注入变成跨会话控制。

    Zombie Agent 把自进化 LLM 智能体的跨会话记忆当成攻击面:攻击者只发布网页,良性任务读入后,正常记忆更新留下载荷,并在以后无关会话里触发未授权工具行为。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  14. DefensesarXiv 2602.10915

    Blind Gods and Broken Screens: Building a Secure, Intent-Centric Mobile Agent Operating System

    Proposes Aura, which uses a trusted kernel to mediate the identity, perception, and action control of mobile agents

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Gemini-3-Flash
    AbstractAura mediates structured interactions via the Agent Kernel.

    Aura uses kernel-mediated structured agent interaction, replacing screen-interface mobile assistants..

    Paper analysisRead analysis