Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 328 papers
Filter4
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 213papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 213papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.12644

    Cancerous backdoor attack: progressive activation via invisible tokens and a stage controller.

    Proposes the Cancerous backdoor, which progressively corrupts reasoning using invisible stage tokens.

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3
    AbstractHidden tokens plus a stage controller make the backdoor progressively corrupt reasoning upon triggering, and the authors believe that looking only at the answer will miss it.

    Cancerous Backdoor Attack changes LLM backdoors from one-time activation to multi-stage reasoning corruption that accumulates progressively with triggers.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. Study: legal reasoning models citing legal provisions does not equal relying on legal provisions.

    Uses premise permutation and hidden-layer tracing to audit whether legal chain-of-thought truly relies on the cited legal provisions.

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-8B, Qwen3-14B, Llama-3.1-8B and others7
    AbstractUsing counterfactual substitution of authorities and internal commitment tracing, the authors find that legal CoT rulings depend on authorities only to a limited extent and are vulnerable to prompt injection manipulation.

    This study conducts an empirical audit of the causal truthfulness of legal citations in chain-of-thought reasoning of large language models in the legal domain.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2610.12292

    The paper proposes an option channel attack: changing one option label can make an agent guardrail allow a prohibited operation

    Proposing an option channel attack that renames option labels so that agent guardrails allow prohibited operations

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    LAYA-TD, LAYA-EN, LAYA-ML and others5

    AbstractThe authors' evaluation indicates that typed models should not serve as final safety arbiters; they are susceptible to off-policy text and option name manipulation, and confidence filtering cannot resist attacks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. Paper audits LLM judge reliability: repeated agreement does not equal correctness

    Auditing LLM judge reliability and defining trustworthy verdict rate and accuracy upper bound

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.2, GPT-4o, Gemini-2.5-Pro and others6
    AbstractThe authors claim that comparing judges should look at T, not just accuracy.

    The authors audit whether LLM-as-a-Judge decisions can still be treated as actionable ground truth under repeated queries, swapped candidate order, and changed prompt formats.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. 研究提出 Agent 安全新维度:识别未履行的安全义务

    提出义务识别基准 ObligationBench,并训练护栏识别 Agent 未履行的安全义务

    Published
    Evaluated models
    ObligationGuard, Claude-Opus-4.8, GPT-5.6-Sol and others17
    Abstract义务是护栏缺口。

    作者认为编码智能体的安全不能只靠拦截禁止动作,还要找出终止时仍未做的安全关键动作,并将其称为义务。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. 研究提出三项指标衡量 LLM 不思考行为,发现被要求停止思考时仍持续显式推理

    度量关闭思考指令下终答前是否仍有可见显式推理

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-4B, Qwen3-32B, Qwen3-235B-A22B and others6
    Abstract作者用三级指标测 no-thinking,并称模型有随答案空间加重的思考惯性。

    作者把 no-thinking 定义为可测量的回答行为,而不是从思考开关、特殊标记或输出长度推断。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. 研究:大语言模型版本更替削弱 AI 辅助科研写作筛查

    测量 LLM 版本更替对科学摘要 AI 改写检测器的影响

    Published
    Evaluated models
    RoBERTa-base, Pangram
    Abstract作者称检测器的基准准确率只是临时的,每次发布都要连同更早版本重验。

    作者量化的是:科学摘要的 AI 改写筛查,在 LLM 版本不断更换、而人类摘要误标必须少见时,会怎样变。问题来自期刊和会议已经按分数阈值筛查投稿,但基准多停在评估时可得的版本上。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. DefensesarXiv 2610.11464

    研究者提出可检查评分器与自改进 Agent 共同演化方法

    演化可检查评分器并与自改进 Agent 共同演化,抑制奖励作弊

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.7
    Abstract十项锚点演化可检查评分器。

    开放任务没有验证器时,被演化的是评分器,而不是再补一条手写 rubric。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. DefensesarXiv 2610.11352

    RL-ARC:用推理引导的不确定性校准大型推理模型

    提出 RL-ARC,用推理置信度在强化学习中校准推理模型

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-7B, Qwen3-8B, Llama-8B distilled from DeepSeek-R1
    AbstractRL-ARC 用推理置信度调节答案置信度,作者称可少牺牲精度并改善 ID 与 OOD 校准。

    RL-ARC 是校准感知的强化学习框架,用推理过程的口头置信度调节答案置信度。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. DefensesarXiv 2610.11281

    包络采样:用少量真值标注重校准 LLM 评委以缓解奖励作弊

    提出包络采样,用少量真值标注重标定 LLM 评委以缓解奖励作弊

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-4B, Qwen3.8-27B, Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct
    Abstract包络采样把真值标注打到代理尾部,同样预算下缓解 reward hacking。

    作者研究后训练前如何选择真值标注的查询分布,使重标定后的廉价代理更适合被优化。真奖励昂贵时,实践用 LLM judge 代替人类。若失准只发生在基座很少生成的输出上,on-policy 标注修不到这些点,随后的 KL 正则优化会把质量集中到被高估的输出。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. EpiReal-Bench:商用图像生成模型虚假声明红队基准

    构建 EpiReal-Bench,评测图像生成器将虚假主张渲染为可信证据

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    GPT-Image-2, Nano Banana 2, Grok Imagen 2.0 and others4
    Abstract四款商用图像模型能把假主张画成可信证据。

    EpiReal-Bench 用来量商用图像生成器会不会把虚假现实主张画成可信视觉证据。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. 研究发现大语言模型被要求不诚实作答时推理 token 数上升

    检验推理 token 数能否区分被提示的诚实与不诚实作答

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Gemma-4-e4b, Qwen-3.5-9b, GPT-OSS-120B
    Abstract被提示不诚实时推理 token 组水平更高。

    三个推理模型在被提示的回答政策下出现组水平推理 token 差异。作者把它当作不读思维链内容的 black-box 候选信号,而不是自发欺骗检测器。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  13. DefensesarXiv 2610.09793

    用时序逻辑监控工具 Agent

    提出 MFOTL 离线时序验证以监控工具 Agent 的危险动作链

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Abstract形式化验证可有效识别多步攻击,但其有效性高度依赖轨迹的可信历史记录。

    这篇论文对工具调用大语言模型智能体的安全监控进行了形式化时序验证研究。

    Paper analysisRead analysis