The study uses the Gollac framework to analyze 39 testimonies from AI labs and ten incidents at OpenAI and Anthropic.

Charles Broutin analyzed 39 public testimonies from AI lab personnel using an occupational psychosocial risk framework and discussed ten safety incidents and work environment factors. The author identified themes such as value conflicts, impaired work quality, insufficient evaluation time, and warnings not being heeded, and proposed improving organizational safety through workload, evaluator judgment discretion, and error analysis. The article is a qualitative study that has not yet been peer-reviewed and uses AI-assisted coding; public testimonies have selection bias, so it cannot be used to estimate general industry proportions or establish a causal relationship between work stress and incidents.