Skip to content

Adversarial Examples and Cloud Detectors: A Black-Box Empirical Study

Adversarial Examples Versus Cloud-based Detectors: A Black-box Empirical Study

arXiv· arXiv:1901.01223· IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 2019· Xurong Li, Shouling Ji, Meng Han, Juntao Ji, Zhenyu Ren, Yushan Liu, Chunming WuInstitute of Cyberspace Research and the College of Computer Science and Technology at Zhejiang University; School of Computer Science and Technology at Georgia Institute of Technology; College of Computing and Software Engineering, Kennesaw State University; Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton UniversityIndexed by this site · 14 days ago· Originally publishedSelected AttacksSelectedAttention38

Translation in progress — untranslated text is omitted.

Quick read

Attacks

Based on the paper PDF (AI-generated); refer to the original

AI summaryThe researchers proposed four types of black-box adversarial example attacks combined with semantic segmentation, with success rates approaching 100% at the highest on the image detection services of five cloud platforms. The four types of attacks are image processing, single pixel, subject-based local search and subject-based boundary attack; adversarial examples are generated only by querying the black-box API, some iterative attacks require only several thousand queries, and all experiments were completed using the platforms' free quotas. On AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Baidu Cloud and Alibaba Cloud, the success rate of the image-processing-based attack reached about 100%, and the semantic-segmentation-based attacks exceeded 90% on the violence, politician and pornography detection services, with differences among platforms in detection strength for different content types. The authors also discussed potential defenses such as adversarial training, input detection, randomization and limiting the number of queries, and said they had reported the vulnerabilities to the relevant cloud platforms.

Questions
The violence, politician, pornography and other image detection services provided by cloud platforms have more complex structures than classifiers and are exposed as black-box APIs; the authors believe their adversarial example risk has not been sufficiently studied.
Methods
The authors propose four black-box attacks: the IP attack based on five image processing techniques, the SP attack combined with semantic segmentation, the subject-region-based local search SBLS attack, and the subject-region-based boundary SBB attack, requiring only the labels and probabilities/scores returned by the API.
Experiments and results
On the five cloud platforms AWS, Azure, Google, Baidu and Alibaba, the authors report that the IP attack success rate is about 100% and the semantic-segmentation-based attacks exceed 90% (Table 2); iterative attacks generate adversarial examples in at most fewer than 3000 queries (Table 9).
Limitations and future work
The authors state that defenses such as adversarial training, input detection and randomization could not be tested because the models are hosted by third parties; Median Filter can defend against most Salt-and-Pepper, SP and SBLS attacks but reduces detection accuracy; the authors plan to improve the algorithms and study general attack methods.
Why it was selectedThe paper empirically tests four types of black-box attacks on five cloud platforms, compares the vulnerability of different image moderation services on pornographic, violent and political content, and can be used to assess the adversarial risk of cloud content moderation.

The paper empirically tests four types of black-box attacks on five cloud platforms, compares the vulnerability of different image moderation services on pornographic, violent and political content, and can be used to assess the adversarial risk of cloud content moderation.

Related papers

Show 3 more papers
Read originalIEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 2019