Skip to content
arXiv: Alignment, Deception & Oversight· arXiv:2610.28819· Eran Goldstein, Yuval Belfer, Yonatan Belinkov, Daniel Gissin·Indexed by this site · Originally published

LIFT: Partitioned constraints for evaluating and training instruction following

LIFT: Scoped Constraints for Evaluating and Training Instruction Following

AI summary

The researchers propose the Lift-Bench instruction-following benchmark, which requires models to draft documents based on a given topic and structured outline, with constraints confined to specific document sections, including both verifiable and judged constraint types, and accompanied by a training set, Lift-Train. In response to the problem that verifiable constraints in common benchmarks such as IFEval are used as reinforcement learning rewards and may induce constraint reward hacking, this benchmark provides both a main task and instruction-following constraints to mitigate shallow reward hacking. Multi-model experiments show that frontier models struggle on the harder subset, and the authors find that training with Lift-Train is less prone to reward hacking than common IFTrain. The benchmark, training set and data generation pipeline have been made public.

Read originalarxiv.org