Skip to content
arXiv· arXiv:2112.15422· Peter Vamplew, Benjamin J. Smith, Johan Kallstrom, Gabriel Ramos, Roxana Radulescu, Diederik M. Roijers, Conor F. Hayes, Fredrik Heintz, Patrick Mannion, Pieter J. K. Libin, Richard Dazeley, Cameron Foale·Indexed by this site · Originally published

Scalar Reward Is Not Enough: A Response to Silver, Singh, Precup and Sutton (2021)

Scalar reward is not enough: A response to Silver, Singh, Precup and Sutton (2021)

AI summary

In a response paper, Peter Vamplew et al. rebut the scalar reward premise of Silver et al.'s "Reward is Enough," arguing for an explicit multi-objective reward model. The authors argue that scalar rewards cannot explain certain aspects of biological and computational intelligence; even if scalar rewards can trigger intelligent behavior in specific cases, using them for artificial general intelligence would still bring unacceptable risks of unsafe or unethical behavior.

Read originalAutonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems