Skip to content
FAR.AI·Indexed by this site · Originally publishedSelectedAttention50

FAR.AI research on scaling trends in SOLiD lie-detector supervision

Scaling Trends for Lie Detector Oversight in Preference Learning | FAR.AI

AI summary

FAR.AI tests on the SOLiD protocol whether lie-detector-based preference learning supervision scales with model size. SOLiD uses a linear probe to read the model's middle-layer residual stream, flags suspicious answers and escalates them to trusted labelers, and leaves the rest to cheap labelers. On Llama-3 (1B to 405B) and Qwen-3 (0.6B to 32B), when the probe's true positive rate is at least 0.8, the proportion of undetected deception decreases significantly with scale (p < 0.01); at a TPR of 0.99, Llama's missed deception rate drops from 34% at 1B to 14% at 405B. The SOLiD-Defer variant without trusted labelers performs close to the full protocol at low false positive rates. However, the method relies on the probe's training data matching the fine-tuning data distribution; cross-dataset transfer (MASK, TrueFalseFacts to DolusChat) substantially raises false positive rates, especially severe on Qwen.

Why it was selected

FAR.AI uses the Llama and Qwen model families to verify the scaling trend of probe-guided supervision and identifies the boundary conditions under which cross-dataset transfer fails.

Read originalfar.ai