Skip to content
arXiv· arXiv:2404.13161· Manish Bhatt, Sahana Chennabasappa, Yue Li, Cyrus Nikolaidis, Daniel Song, Shengye Wan, Faizan Ahmad, Cornelius Aschermann, Yaohui Chen, Dhaval Kapil, David Molnar, Spencer Whitman, Joshua Saxe·Indexed by this site · Originally published

CyberSecEval 2: A broad cybersecurity evaluation suite for large language models

CyberSecEval 2: A Wide-Ranging Cybersecurity Evaluation Suite for Large Language Models

AI summary

Researchers released CyberSecEval 2, a cybersecurity evaluation suite that quantifies the security risks and capabilities of large language models, adding two new categories of tests: prompt injection and code interpreter abuse. Evaluations of models including GPT-4, Mistral, Meta Llama 3 70B-Instruct, and Code Llama show that the prompt injection test success rates of all tested models range from 26% to 41%, and eliminating attack risk through conditioning remains an unsolved problem. The paper proposes a trade-off between safety and utility, quantified by the false refusal rate (FRR), and finds that many models can complete

Read originalarxiv.org