Scaling trends in LLM data poisoning
Scaling Trends for Data Poisoning in LLMs
Testing on 24 frontier LLMs ranging from 1.5B to 72B parameters, the researchers found that larger models are more susceptible to data poisoning, learning harmful behaviors faster from exposure to very small amounts of harmful data. The paper examines three threat models: malicious fine-tuning, imperfect data management, and deliberate data contamination, and notes that GPT models remain susceptible to fine-tuning on poisoned data even with moderation system protection. The authors accordingly recommend that AI companies conduct thorough red-teaming of fine-tuning APIs before public release and develop more robust poisoning defenses as model scale and capability continue to grow.
Related events and news
0 events · 4 news mentions
News that mentions this paper
- FAR.AIcites the paper's id or linkFAR.AI 披露 jailbreak-tuning 数据投毒攻击:GPT-4o 拒答率降至 3.6%
For more information, read our full paper “Data Poisoning in LLMs: Jailbreak-Tuning and Scaling Laws.” If you are interested in working on problems in AI safety, we’re hiring.
- FAR.AIcites the paper's id or linkFAR.AI 红队测试:DeepSeek R1 与 OpenAI、Anthropic、Google 可微调模型的护栏可被轻易移除
We also test the more recent Skeleton jailbreak;
- FAR.AIcites the paper's id or linkFAR.AI 开源安全差距评估工具包,量化 Llama-3 移除护栏后的危险能力
Bowen et al., 2024).
Show 1 more news items
- IAPScites the paper's id or linkIAPS 政策备忘录:AI 决策支持系统是被忽视的军事 AI 风险来源
Data Poisoning: An adversary corrupts the model’s training data, causing it to learn subtly incorrect behaviors that are difficult to detect after the fact.