Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

#arXiv

No new updates indexed today yet

Page 41 Newer contentBack to latest

Dec 6, 2025Sat
Dec 4, 2025Thu
  1. Failure-First · Indexed · Original News50

    Foot-In-The-Door: A Multi-Turn Jailbreak Method for LLMs(original, opens in a new tab)

    The paper by Weng et al. proposes the multi-turn jailbreak method Foot-In-The-Door (FITD), which gradually escalates the malicious intent of user queries through intermediate bridging prompts, transitioning from benign requests to harmful content, achieving an average attack success rate of 94% across seven mainstream models, higher than existing multi-turn and single-turn methods. The method exploits the model's self-corruption mechanism of treating its own previous answers as acceptable grounds, forming a feedback loop that lowers the threshold for subsequent harmful requests; since each turn is harmless in isolation, safety mechanisms calibrated for single-turn threats are difficult to trigger. The authors argue this is a structural weakness of autoregressive models in handling multi-turn contexts, rather than an implementation flaw of a specific model.

Dec 3, 2025Wed
  1. Failure-First · Indexed · Original News43

    Red Teaming Generative AI: Silver Bullet or Security Theater?(original, opens in a new tab)

    Feffer et al. at CMU systematically analyze AI red teaming practices, examining six industry cases including Bing Chat, GPT-4, Gopher, Claude, and DEFCON, and surveying 104 papers. They find that the term is used inconsistently across purpose, evaluation targets, threat models, team composition, and result reporting, and that many public-facing red teaming exercises resemble security theater more than rigorous safety evaluation. The study identifies five axes of divergence and categorizes the literature into four method types: manual brute-force evaluation, AI-assisted attack generation, algorithmic search over prompt space, and targeted attacks against specific vulnerabilities. The paper distinguishes context-dependent harms from universally unacceptable content, noting that time-limited crowdsourced evaluations favor easily producible harmful outputs, creating an illusion of coverage. The authors propose a three-stage checklist of questions to standardize red teaming processes. The paper was submitted as a comment on the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and published at AAAI/ACM AIES 2024.

Dec 2, 2025Tue
  1. Failure-First · Indexed · Original News53

    ArtPrompt: ASCII Art Jailbreak Attack against Aligned Large Language Models(original, opens in a new tab)

    The paper by Jiang et al. proposes ArtPrompt, which renders sensitive keywords as ASCII art embedded in normal prompts to bypass the safety measures of aligned large language models, requiring only black-box access for the attack. The paper proposes the ViTC benchmark to evaluate models' ability to recognize prompts that require visual rather than purely semantic interpretation, and the five tested models—GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Gemini, Claude, and Llama2—all performed poorly. The authors argue this approach can be generalized to encoding methods such as Base64, ROT13, and leet that models can decode but safety filters do not cover. Failure-First categorizes it into the encoding attack family and notes it is especially relevant to embodied AI, where sensor data is inherently multimodal and multi-encoded.

Nov 28, 2025Fri
Nov 26, 2025Wed
Nov 24, 2025Mon
Nov 20, 2025Thu
Nov 18, 2025Tue
Nov 12, 2025Wed
Nov 11, 2025Tue
  1. Failure-First · Indexed · Original News47

    Paper "Lifelong Safety Alignment for Language Models"(original, opens in a new tab)

    Wang et al.'s paper formalizes the confrontation between jailbreak attackers and model defenders as a competitive co-evolutionary framework: Meta-Attacker uses GPT-4o to extract and generalize attack strategies from published jailbreak research papers, with an initial attack success rate of 73% and a transfer success rate of 57% on another benchmark. After multiple rounds of iterative fine-tuning by the defender, the attack success rate drops to about 7%, and Meta-Attacker's effectiveness tends to plateau. The framework is deployed for an "unrestricted environment" without pre-filtering. The paper does not report utility metrics alongside safety metrics, nor does it discuss computational cost or out-of-distribution attack categories; Failure-First believes the residual 7% of attacks may exploit reasoning-level vulnerabilities.

Nov 10, 2025Mon
Nov 4, 2025Tue
Oct 31, 2025Fri
Oct 28, 2025Tue
Oct 23, 2025Thu
  1. arXiv · Indexed · Original Paper54

    引导评测感知的语言模型表现得像处于部署状态(original, opens in a new tab)

    研究者训练了一个评测感知的模型生物,并证明激活引导能让它在评测语境中表现出部署时的行为。

    Why it was selected论文用专门训练的评测感知模型生物,验证激活引导可让模型在评测中表现出部署行为,为安全评测的可信度问题提供实验证据。

Oct 22, 2025Wed
Oct 18, 2025Sat
  1. Tech Policy Press · Indexed · Original News36

    What research says about AI sycophancy(original, opens in a new tab)

    A Tech Policy Press review summarizes three new papers examining how AI sycophancy (models sacrificing truthfulness to agree with users) is evaluated and its impact on users. The arXiv paper SycEval reports that 58.19% of conversations in its sample exhibit sycophantic behavior, with Gemini highest (62.47%) and ChatGPT lowest (56.71%), and notes that cited rebuttals most easily trigger regression-type sycophancy, and on the medical advice dataset MedQuad, models often agree with incorrect user beliefs and give dangerous or misleading medical advice. Another study testing 11 models found they affirm user behavior 50% more than humans; in two pre-registered experiments (N=1604), participants exposed to sycophantic models felt more correct and were less willing to fix conflicts. A third study showed that interacting with sycophantic chatbots increased stance extremity by 2.68 percentage points and stance certainty by 4.04 percentage points, with the author arguing that polarization mainly comes from selective presentation of supportive facts.

Oct 16, 2025Thu
Oct 15, 2025Wed
Oct 14, 2025Tue
  1. 论文追踪 · Indexed · Original Paper56

    The research shows that simple attacks can bypass the safety guardrails of reasoning models such as gpt-oss(original, opens in a new tab)

    Proposes four stage transition attacks to bypass the safety reasoning guardrails of reasoning models.

    Why it was selectedThe paper reveals that the stage transition logic of reasoning-based safety guardrails can be simply manipulated, and provides attack success rates across models and closed-source APIs, offering transferable failure analysis for guardrail design.

Oct 10, 2025Fri
  1. 论文追踪 · Indexed · Original Paper57

    Researchers use prompt injection to attack monitoring models, bypassing AI control protocols(original, opens in a new tab)

    Proposes adaptive prompt injection against trusted monitors, bypassing AI control protocols.

    Why it was selectedThe paper treats the monitoring model itself as an attack surface, using prompt injection to make untrusted models bypass AI control protocols, and points out that Defer-to-Resample amplifies the attack.

Oct 9, 2025Thu
Oct 8, 2025Wed
Oct 7, 2025Tue
Oct 6, 2025Mon