Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

Agent safety · Papers

Found 18 papers
  1. DefensesarXiv 2610.02861

    论文提出在 Kubernetes 上保护 AI Agent 的七层纵深防御框架与参考架构

    提出 Kubernetes 运维智能体的七层纵深防御框架与参考架构

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Abstract把运维智能体当不可信租户,用七层控制在完全攻破假设下约束行动。

    把 Kubernetes 上的运维智能体当作不可信租户,在假定提示注入已完全控制其工具选择的前提下,用基础设施重建数据面与控制面的边界。要解决的是:智能体读日志、注解、工单或 MCP 工具描述时,这些内容可以变成它带着自身凭据执行的命令。模型对齐和分类器只降低概率。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2610.03089

    COBRA: A Dual-LLM Architecture for Defending Computer-Using Agents Against Branch-Jumping Attacks

    提出 COBRA 双 LLM 架构,防御计算机使用 Agent 的分支转向攻击

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gpt-5, UI-TARS-1.5-7B, claude-sonnet-5 and others6

    Abstract提出分支转向防御架构 COBRA,通过事前能力约束与边界代理消除分支转向攻击并兼顾效用。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. DefensesarXiv 2609.35659

    Tracekit:面向自主编码 Agent 的防篡改意图-推理-动作审计系统

    提出 Tracekit,审计编码 Agent 的意图、推理与动作并检测账本篡改

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude Code (claude -p, version 2.1), 独立评审(同一 CLI,无工具)
    AbstractTracekit 把意图、自述和动作写入可锚定的哈希链。

    Tracekit 是无第三方依赖的编码智能体审计层:把人类请求、模型自述和已执行动作并排写入可外部锚定的哈希链,执行前用正则门,事后用规则和独立模型互查。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. DefensesarXiv 2609.31282

    基于区块链的 Agentic AI 框架:面向安全软件供应链的资源优化与能耗感知

    提出 AttestChain,将供应链安全智能体报告签名上链并据此控制发布

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-class LLM
    AbstractAttestChain 将智能体报告与链上发布门控结合,现有证据来自受控合成构建的总体结果。

    AttestChain 是一个把 LLM 安全检查、智能体身份验证和许可链发布策略连接起来的软件供应链防御框架。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. DefensesarXiv 2609.05901

    KITA:为 LLM Agent 设计密钥隔离的阈值签名授权架构

    提出 KITA,把 Agent 批准绑定到规范动作的密钥隔离阈值签名

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractKITA 把隔离的阈值签名当作精确动作的执行条件,并测量门控、相关性与签名开销。

    KITA 是一套密钥隔离的阈值授权架构,用来把模型评审变成执行外部动作的条件。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. DefensesarXiv 2608.21101

    ClawSentry:面向自主 LLM Agent 的渐进式多层安全监控网关

    提出 ClawSentry 多层监控网关,在技能准入和运行时拦截恶意技能与隐藏指令

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Codex/GPT-5.4, Codex/GPT-5.5, Claude Code/GLM-5.1 and others6
    AbstractClawSentry 用包准入、三级运行时门控和反绕过,压低 skill 攻击并保住干净任务。

    ClawSentry 是挂在智能体运行时之外的安全监督网关,用来同时盖住 skill 执行的多个生命周期边界,并把已被拒绝的效果记到会话里。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. DefensesarXiv 2607.13716

    CAVA:面向智能体 AI 运行时治理的规范动作验证与证明

    提出 CAVA,将异构智能体运行时事件规范为可哈希动作并绑定审批与回执

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractCAVA 用规范动作指纹承接异构运行时治理。

    CAVA 是给异构智能体运行时用的动作语义层,用来回答“被批准和被审计的到底是哪一个动作”。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. DefensesarXiv 2603.12644

    Revealing security threats and defense architectures for autonomous agents: an OpenClaw case study

    Reviews threats to autonomous agents and proposes a full-lifecycle defense blueprint, FASA

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractUsing OpenClaw as an example, it divides risks into three layers and uses FASA to describe defense from input to system execution.

    This is a threat review and defense architecture report using OpenClaw as a case study, not a scored attack or defense evaluation.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. DefensesarXiv 2603.11619

    Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Threats in Autonomous LLM Agents

    Proposes a defense-in-depth aligned with the five stages to mitigate cross-stage threats to autonomous agents

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractThis is a lifecycle threat analysis and layered mitigation design for OpenClaw, with the cases serving as qualitative evidence.

    This is a lifecycle threat analysis of OpenClaw, accompanied by a set of layered mitigation designs. The problem addressed is: when autonomous agents connect instant messaging, persistent memory, third-party plugins, and high-privilege execution, attacks are no longer limited to single-turn jailbreaks but can compound across multiple stages from initialization to execution. The authors argue that defenses hardening only individual interfaces cannot stop such cross-temporal attacks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. DefensesarXiv 2602.10915

    Blind Gods and Broken Screens: Building a Secure, Intent-Centric Mobile Agent Operating System

    Proposes Aura, which uses a trusted kernel to mediate the identity, perception, and action control of mobile agents

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Gemini-3-Flash
    AbstractAura mediates structured interactions via the Agent Kernel.

    Aura uses kernel-mediated structured agent interaction, replacing screen-interface mobile assistants..

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end