Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 7 papers
Filter3
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 232papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 232papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.04589

    StegoMemory red team testing: agent persistent memory can be used as a cross-session covert channel

    提出 StegoMemory,评测智能体持久记忆作为跨会话隐写信道

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Llama 3.1 405B, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o and others13

    Abstract研究揭示智能体持久记忆可作为隐蔽信道跨会话传输机密,写入持久化是主要防御瓶颈,呼吁建立记忆完整性防御。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2609.35576

    研究提出跨 LLM 助手的记忆跳跃攻击

    提出跨独立 Agent 的记忆跳跃攻击,经共享工件在助手间自传播

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.6 Luna, Kimi-K2.6, GPT-OSS-120B and others6
    Abstract论文证实持久工件与内存可形成跨智能体传播链,揭示了将共享工件纳入安全防线的重要意义。

    该论文系统研究并量化了通过共享持久工件在具有独立私有内存的 LLM 智能体之间发生自传播的“工件介导传播”攻击风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2605.11047

    DeepTrap 框架在 OpenClaw 上自动挖掘智能体执行上下文漏洞

    提出 DEEPTRAP 以搜索可诱导不安全轨迹的执行上下文载荷

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.4, Claude Sonnet 4.6, GLM-5 and others9
    AbstractDEEPTRAP 用轨迹级搜索发现 OpenClaw 上下文风险,作者称不能只看最终回复。

    DEEPTRAP 是针对 OpenClaw 的自动化红队框架,搜索执行前被改写的文件、记忆、技能、工具元数据或配置,而不是改用户指令。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. Trojan Hippo Bench: A Dynamic Benchmark for Persistent Memory Attacks and Defenses on LLM Agents

    构建 Trojan Hippo Bench,评测 Agent 持久记忆投毒与外泄

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Gemini 3.1 Pro, GPT-5-mini, GPT-5

    Abstract论文提出了评测智能体持久化记忆攻击与防御的 Trojan Hippo Bench,揭示了潜伏攻击威胁及内存防御的安全与效用权衡。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2603.17239

    LAAF: A Systematic Red-Teaming Method and Automated Attack Framework for LPCI Vulnerabilities in Agentic LLM Systems

    Proposes LAAF, which automatically attacks LPCI vulnerabilities in agent systems in stages

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gemini-2.0-flash-001, claude-3-haiku-20240307, meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct and others5
    AbstractLAAF does LPCI red teaming with taxonomy plus stage seeding.

    The authors state that LAAF is an automated red-teaming framework built specifically for LPCI in agentic LLMs. The issue to address is that encoded, delayed, and conditionally triggered payloads can persist in memory or RAG and re-enter across sessions, whereas Garak and PyRIT do not use the previous round's breakthrough results to seed the next stage across the six stages.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2507.10457

    论文提出 LPCI:针对 Agent 逻辑层与持久记忆的提示控制注入攻击

    提出 LPCI,把延迟条件载荷写入记忆与检索库以跨会话触发

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    ChatGPT, Claude, LLaMA3 and others8
    Abstract作者定义 LPCI。

    作者把LPCI定义为针对智能体逻辑执行、记忆留存和工具集成的跨阶段漏洞类,而不是单次输入上的提示改写。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end