Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 12 papers
Filter4

Attack type

Prompt injection9Poisoning and backdoors8

Attack technique

Gradient and representation optimization4Automated search12Encoding and obfuscation6Role-play and persuasion3Reasoning-chain manipulation3Dormant triggers8

Impact

Unauthorized actions5Output manipulation6

System type

LLM applications4AI Agent8coding agent3

Attack surface / entry point

User input66Web pages and interfaces6Documents and messages12Tool responses9Tool and skill descriptions10Code repositories and dependencies7Retrieval corpus6Memory writes18Inter-agent messages3Images, audio and video24Training data15Weights and gradients17Distribution channels22

Layer

Application layer12

System component

Memory4RAG5
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 233papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack technique：Encoding and obfuscationAttack technique：Dormant triggersAttack surface / entry point：Code repositories and dependenciesAttack surface / entry point：Retrieval corpusClear all

Another 233papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.07510

    PersistBD: attackers can strengthen backdoors before release so that they maintain high attack success rates even after developer SFT and RL.

    提出 PERSISTBD，发布前强化供应链后门使其经良性 SFT 与 RL 后仍外发凭据

    arXiv
    2610.07510
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-Coder-3B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct, Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
    Abstract总结了论文关于后门在 SFT/RL 中存活的发现、两因子机制、PERSISTBD 方法与核心数字。

    本文研究第三方 LLM 智能体在开发者进行良性监督微调（SFT）和强化学习（RL）后训练时的后门持久性风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2609.22510

    特拉维夫大学提出爆炸性提示词：条件触发的间接提示注入可绕过九款生产 Agent

    提出条件触发的爆炸提示词，并设计摄入期检测器 DeFuse

    arXiv
    2609.22510
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct and others15
    Abstract论文揭示了条件触发使提示注入绕过防御并在触发时执行工具，提出轻量检测器并在摄入期有效防范。

    论文针对大语言模型智能体面临的间接提示注入威胁，研究了利用条件句式实现时间分离的爆炸提示词。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2609.02774

    CodePoisonRAG：针对检索增强代码生成的知识投毒攻击

    提出 CodePoisonRAG，对检索增强代码生成的知识库投毒以植入漏洞

    arXiv
    2609.02774
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Evaluated models
    Qwen 3.5 9B, Code Llama 13B, DeepSeek-Coder-V2 16B

    AbstractCodePoisonRAG 展示了 RACG 外部知识库的新攻击面，在较低投毒率下可定向诱发指定漏洞并部分抵御防御。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2607.14493

    LogInject 框架披露 LLM 日志分析中的被动提示注入

    提出 LogInject 框架，评测日志分析中的被动提示注入及缓解

    arXiv
    2607.14493
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Llama-3-70B-Instruct

    Abstract论文评估了 LLM 日志分析中的上下文污染风险，提出分片拼接等攻击与三层防御，指出必须结合架构隔离与人工介入。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2605.15338

    Hidden in Memory: Latent Memory Poisoning of LLM Agents

    提出潜伏记忆投毒，诱导 Agent 把外部文档写成持久伪造记忆

    arXiv
    2605.15338
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.4, GPT-5.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6 and others12
    Abstract持久记忆成为跨会话攻击面：通用载荷可写入伪造记忆，并在相关后续任务中影响行为。

    sleeper memory poisoning 研究带持久记忆的 LLM 助手：外部文档能否让助手存下一则伪造的用户记忆，并在原文档消失后的新会话里被取回、用来改变回复或动作。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. AttacksarXiv 2603.17239

    LAAF: A Systematic Red-Teaming Method and Automated Attack Framework for LPCI Vulnerabilities in Agentic LLM Systems

    Proposes LAAF, which automatically attacks LPCI vulnerabilities in agent systems in stages

    arXiv
    2603.17239
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gemini-2.0-flash-001, claude-3-haiku-20240307, meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct and others5
    AbstractLAAF does LPCI red teaming with taxonomy plus stage seeding.

    The authors state that LAAF is an automated red-teaming framework built specifically for LPCI in agentic LLMs. The issue to address is that encoded, delayed, and conditionally triggered payloads can persist in memory or RAG and re-enter across sessions, whereas Garak and PyRIT do not use the previous round's breakthrough results to seed the next stage across the six stages.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. AttacksarXiv 2512.01335

    EmoRAG 研究揭示 RAG 检索对表情符号扰动的脆弱性

    提出 EmoRAG，向查询与知识库注入同一表情以劫持 RAG 检索

    arXiv
    2512.01335
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Evaluated models
    SPECTER, Contriever, Qwen2-7B and others11
    AbstractEmoRAG 用表情联动查询与库文本。

    EmoRAG 测量 RAG 对符号扰动的反应：同一表情同时出现在查询和库文本里时，检索会偏离语义匹配。作者要检查的是，检索是否真由语义相关性决定。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. AttacksarXiv 2509.22040

    研究：通过编码规则文件对Cursor与GitHub Copilot实施提示注入

    通过规则文件提示注入劫持编码编辑器并执行未授权终端命令

    arXiv
    2509.22040
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Claude 4 Sonnet and others4

    Abstract论文提出了针对代码编辑器的提示注入评估框架 AIShellJack，实验显示攻击能诱导 AI 执行未授权终端命令。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. AttacksarXiv 2507.10457

    论文提出 LPCI：针对 Agent 逻辑层与持久记忆的提示控制注入攻击

    提出 LPCI，把延迟条件载荷写入记忆与检索库以跨会话触发

    arXiv
    2507.10457
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    ChatGPT, Claude, LLaMA3 and others8
    Abstract作者定义 LPCI。

    作者把LPCI定义为针对智能体逻辑执行、记忆留存和工具集成的跨阶段漏洞类，而不是单次输入上的提示改写。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end