Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 12 · Monday
Another 281 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
提出 Bi-QSTO，优化能穿过质量筛选并在微调中削弱安全对齐的投毒样本
Published Oct 1
Evaluated models Llama2-7B-Chat , Llama3-8B-Instruct , Qwen2-7B-Instruct and others5 Abstract 质量筛选挡不住部分高分样本的安全削弱。Bi-QSTO 研究一个实际训练缺口：基于质量的数据选择会先于微调决定样本去留，而以往微调投毒多假设毒样本直接进入训练集。已对齐 LLM 的拒答会被少量有害或看似无害的微调样本削弱。作者用三个问题串起实验：选择能否排除毒样本。
提出 VPH 与 VTH，只改视频帧劫持世界模型并投毒下游策略
Published Jun 8
Evaluated models Cosmos-Predict 2.5 , Cosmos-Predict 2.5 AC , Dino WM and others4 Abstract 只改视频帧经世界模型投毒。只改看似安全的视频帧，经世界模型之后才改变下游机器人策略。 问题在于世界模型进入数据生成后，数据集检查看到的仍是安全演示，合成轨迹却可以变危险。
You have reached the end