Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 21 papers

Another 201papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.12524

    An exploration of attacks on AI agent systems

    Retest and extend prompt injection against AI agents, and use Agent Card deception to manipulate A2A selection

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Ollama Mistral 0.9.5, llama3-8b-8192, gemini-2.0-flash-lite and others5
    AbstractSingle-agent filtering and classification can be bypassed by format or wording, and A2A card selection is also biased toward names and descriptions.

    The authors retested prompt injection on their own LangChain, AutoGen, and A2A systems, and modified the Agent Card to see if choices shifted. The abstract states the experiments mainly highlight single-agent weaknesses while extending attacks to multi-agent.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2610.04985

    研究揭示 Jev 作为应用决策层的安全与隐私风险

    评估应用决策层的输入注入与隐私推断风险

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Jev, NanoJev
    AbstractJev 的类型化决策可被输入与训练操纵,也会泄露信息,并同时支持检测与滥用。

    Jev 是 TypeSafe 的 System One 模型,把应用 state 和固定问题变成 Choice、Noul 或 Score 的类型化决策与概率。作者用官方 API 和可改训练的 NanoJev,考察它作为决策层时的操纵、泄露与双重用途。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2610.04589

    StegoMemory red team testing: agent persistent memory can be used as a cross-session covert channel

    提出 StegoMemory,评测智能体持久记忆作为跨会话隐写信道

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Llama 3.1 405B, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o and others13

    Abstract研究揭示智能体持久记忆可作为隐蔽信道跨会话传输机密,写入持久化是主要防御瓶颈,呼吁建立记忆完整性防御。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2609.38270

    VirusCascade:劫持 LLM 推荐智能体的协同反思机制

    提出 VirusCascade,联合操纵商品描述与交互轨迹以劫持推荐智能体协同反思

    Published
    Evaluated models
    AgentCF, AgentSEQ, AgentRAG and others4
    Abstract作者把反思写回视为推广攻击入口,并用联合操纵和诊断探针研究其持续与传播。

    VirusCascade 是针对推荐智能体协作反思的 black-box targeted promotion 攻击研究。 攻击者只改商品描述和少量账号的普通交互,试图让目标商品获得更多良性用户曝光。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2609.37468

    论文提出针对 Agentic RAG 的检索器后门攻击与 DOU 隐藏方法

    提出检索器后门攻击操纵智能体搜索,并用 DOU 逃避检测

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    E5, Contriever-MSMARCO

    Abstract论文展示了通过恶意检索器操纵智能体多轮搜索并利用诱饵重塑表征隐蔽后门的可行性与系统风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2608.09577

    ElasticBack:通过触发词与规则耦合在 LLM Agent 技能中植入条件后门

    提出 ElasticBack,在单个 Agent 技能中植入条件后门

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GLM-5.2, MiniMax-M3, GPT-5.4 and others4
    AbstractElasticBack 用冻结规则加遗传搜索演化 trigger,在单 skill 上做条件后门。

    ElasticBack 是放在 LLM agent 单个 skill 里的条件后门攻击。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2606.09084

    研究者提出 Context-Fractured Decomposition 攻击

    提出 CFD 跨会话分解攻击,利用工件来源缺口绕过工具型 Agent 的本地检查

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4.1, GPT-5-nano, Claude-3.5-Sonnet and others6
    AbstractCFD 用无指令 artifact 把越狱拆到跨会话。

    CFD针对工具型 LLM 智能体:利用 artifact 来源不被跟踪这一部署失败模式,把有害目标拆开后延迟组合。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. AttacksarXiv 2603.17239

    LAAF: A Systematic Red-Teaming Method and Automated Attack Framework for LPCI Vulnerabilities in Agentic LLM Systems

    Proposes LAAF, which automatically attacks LPCI vulnerabilities in agent systems in stages

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gemini-2.0-flash-001, claude-3-haiku-20240307, meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct and others5
    AbstractLAAF does LPCI red teaming with taxonomy plus stage seeding.

    The authors state that LAAF is an automated red-teaming framework built specifically for LPCI in agentic LLMs. The issue to address is that encoded, delayed, and conditionally triggered payloads can persist in memory or RAG and re-enter across sessions, whereas Garak and PyRIT do not use the previous round's breakthrough results to seed the next stage across the six stages.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. The Continuation vs. Refusal Debate: Mechanism Analysis of Continuation-Triggered Jailbreaks in Large Language Models

    Analyzing the attention head mechanism of continuation-triggered jailbreaks and proposing HCS

    Published
    Evaluated models
    LLaMA-2-7B-Chat, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct
    AbstractThe authors state that jailbreaks arise from competition between two types of heads, and that HCS plus distillation can use this competition for inference-time intervention.

    The authors use attention head mechanism analysis for continuation-triggered jailbreaks: under the same harmful instruction, moving the continuation suffix from after the instruction to outside the prompt boundary makes the model more likely to continue generating along the suffix.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. AttacksarXiv 2603.01414

    Jailbreaking embodied LLMs via action-level manipulation

    Propose Blindfold, jailbreaking embodied LLMs with action-level manipulation

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B, DeepSeek-R1-14B, Gemma-3-27B and others8
    AbstractBlindfold jailbreaks embodied LLMs with action-level proxy planning, and the authors claim it can bypass semantic checks and is effective in both simulation and real-world settings.

    Blindfold is a no-box attack against embodied LLM planning modules, rewriting malicious intent into seemingly benign action sequences.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. AttacksarXiv 2603.00131

    Thought Virus: viral misalignment induced by subliminal prompts in multi-agent systems

    Propose Thought Virus, which propagates preferences along multi-agent messages via subliminal prompts.

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
    AbstractThought Virus spreads a single-point bias downstream.

    Thought Virus puts subliminal prompting into multi-agent communication, to see whether a single-point deviation spreads across the network without naming the target concept.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. AttacksarXiv 2512.01335

    EmoRAG 研究揭示 RAG 检索对表情符号扰动的脆弱性

    提出 EmoRAG,向查询与知识库注入同一表情以劫持 RAG 检索

    Published
    Evaluated models
    SPECTER, Contriever, Qwen2-7B and others11
    AbstractEmoRAG 用表情联动查询与库文本。

    EmoRAG 测量 RAG 对符号扰动的反应:同一表情同时出现在查询和库文本里时,检索会偏离语义匹配。作者要检查的是,检索是否真由语义相关性决定。

    Paper analysisRead analysis