Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 9 papers
Filter7

Attack type

Prompt injection7

Attack technique

Gradient and representation optimization3Automated search12Encoding and obfuscation4Role-play and persuasion4Conversation structure manipulation2Dormant triggers8Selection manipulation0

Impact

Output manipulation7

System type

LLM applications7

Attack surface / entry point

User input17Web pages and interfaces8Documents and messages9Tool responses8Tool and skill descriptions14Retrieval corpus10Memory writes3Inter-agent messages3Images, audio and video10Weights and gradients11Distribution channels14

Layer

Model layer0Application layer9
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 203papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack technique：Gradient and representation optimizationAttack technique：Encoding and obfuscationAttack technique：Conversation structure manipulationAttack technique：Selection manipulationAttack surface / entry point：Documents and messagesLayer：Model layerLayer：Application layerClear all

Another 203papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  2. AttacksarXiv 2609.27542

    Researchers use control token injection to delete gpt-oss-20b's reasoning chain and bypass chain-of-thought monitoring

    提出控制标记注入，清空工具 Agent 的思维链以绕过推理监控

    arXiv
    2609.27542
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    openai/gpt-oss-20b, google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it, deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B and others4

    Abstract论文阐明控制标记注入可抑制 CoT 使监控失效并促成拒绝绕过，且工具执行受解析器宽容度影响。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2606.12716

    PaperGuard：针对多模态 AI 同行评审的攻击与防御基准

    提出 PaperGuard，用图文注入与梯度扰动抬高自动审稿分数并检测恶意指令

    arXiv
    2606.12716
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Evaluated models
    Claude-sonnet-4.5, GPT-4o, GPT-4.1 and others11
    AbstractPaperGuard 测到提示注入与白盒视觉抬分，并比较分块检索防御。

    PaperGuard同时评测并检测多模态 AI 审稿中的评分操纵。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2605.24421

    研究者提出日志型提示注入攻击，可抑制 SOC 中 LLM 分析助手的恶意日志识别

    提出日志基底提示注入，操纵 SOC 分析员的分类、摘要与处置建议

    arXiv
    2605.24421
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Evaluated models
    gpt-4o-mini

    Abstract在 gpt-4o-mini 上，人格劫持与上下文操纵可改写 SOC 分析输出，直接覆盖在分类上无效。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2602.18514

    招聘中的特洛伊木马：标准模型与推理模型间接提示注入的红队测试案例研究

    用简历中的不可见指令做间接提示注入，操纵招聘推荐

    arXiv
    2602.18514
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Evaluated models
    Qwen 3 30B A3B Instruct 2507, Qwen 3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

    Abstract作者称推理在简单注入下会帮攻击圆谎，在不合逻辑的复杂注入下又会把欺骗漏出来。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2602.00364

    "Someone hid it": Query-agnostic black-box attacks against LLM retrieval

    提出查询无关黑盒攻击 DQ-A，用可迁移文末后缀降低文档检索排名

    arXiv
    2602.00364
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Evaluated models
    Qwen-1.5-7B-Instruct, SFR-Embedding-Mistral, E5-Mistral-7B-Instruct and others10
    AbstractDQ-A 以无查询黑盒后缀压低 LLM 检索排名，并在 BRIGHT 上比较三种基线。

    DQ-A 是一种 query-agnostic、complete black-box 的文档隐藏攻击，对象是用最后隐层相似度匹配的 LLM 检索。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2601.21360

    Compliance Paradox: Semantic-Instruction Decoupling in Automated Academic Code Evaluation

    提出 AST-ASIP ，把对抗指令植入编译器忽略区域以劫持代码评分

    arXiv
    2601.21360
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Evaluated models
    DeepSeek-V3.2, Qwen3-235B, GPT-OSS-120B and others9
    Abstract作者称 RLHF 的服从性使评分脱离代码。

    这篇工作把自动代码评分中的失败称为 Compliance Paradox：评分模型可以离开提交逻辑，转而执行嵌在可编译代码里的隐藏指令。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. AttacksarXiv 2601.20283

    One word is enough: Minimal adversarial perturbations for neural text ranking

    提出查询中心词的单次插入或替换攻击，操纵神经排序名次

    arXiv
    2601.20283
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Evaluated models
    BERT-base-mdoc-BM25, monoT5-base-MSMARCO
    Abstract作者称单词扰动即可抬升名次、中段文档最脆弱，且比白盒 PRADA 更少编辑。

    单个与查询对齐的词，就可能改掉神经重排结果。要做的是少改原文，仍把目标文档在 NRM 列表里的名次抬高。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end