Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 77 papers

Filter4

Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 240papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Model risks：Reward hacking Model risks：Hallucination and fabrication Layer：Model layer Layer：Application layer Clear all

Another 240papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Risky behaviorarXiv 2610.12822Oct 9
Reward hacking as a transmissible strategy in multi-agent coding systems
Show that reward hacking can propagate through code, memory, and plans in multi-agent coding systems
arXiv
2610.12822
Published
Oct 9
Layer
Application layer
Setting
Multi-agent systems, coding agent
Evaluated models
Qwen2.5-Coder-14B, Gemma-3-12B, Qwen2.5-Coder-7B and others16
- RiskReward hacking
- ComponentMemory
AbstractThe authors state that reward hacking can spread across models and affect routing and aggregation, and that review can reduce delivery.
Reward hacking induced by coding RL can leave the source agent and enter subsequent collaboration and system coordination.
Paper analysisRead analysis
DefensesarXiv 2610.12463Oct 9
Paper reviews OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google agent safety incidents and proposes the PASAC framework
Proposes PASAC and a five-layer boundary guarantee stack, turning agent evaluation overstepping into verifiable whole-system guarantees.
arXiv
2610.12463
Published
Oct 9
Layer
Application layer
Setting
AI Agent
- DefensesPermissions and approval
- RiskDangerous agent actions
- ComponentPermissions and sandboxing
Paper analysisRead analysis
DefensesarXiv 2610.11754Oct 8
仅凭输出审查无法验证什么：面向研究智能体的研究契约
提出研究合同，把已批准选择绑定到执行证据并由检查器核验
arXiv
2610.11754
Published
Oct 8
Layer
Application layer
Setting
science agent
Evaluated models
OpenAI gpt-5.6-sol, OpenAI gpt-5.6-terra, OpenAI gpt-5.6-luna and others18
- DefensesPermissions and approval
- RiskReward hacking
- ComponentPermissions and sandboxing
Abstract研究合同暴露四类输出单独建不立的关系。
研究合同用来核验计算科学研究智能体是否仍在已批准研究之内，不判断科学是否为真。。
Paper analysisRead analysis
DefensesarXiv 2610.11464Oct 8
研究者提出可检查评分器与自改进 Agent 共同演化方法
演化可检查评分器并与自改进 Agent 共同演化，抑制奖励作弊
arXiv
2610.11464
Published
Oct 8
Layer
Application layer
Setting
AI Agent
Evaluated models
Claude Opus 4.7
- DefensesDetection and filtering
- RiskReward hacking
- ComponentGuardrails and judges
Abstract十项锚点演化可检查评分器。
开放任务没有验证器时，被演化的是评分器，而不是再补一条手写 rubric。
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.10947Oct 8
RH-Detect：统一的奖励作弊检测基准发布
构建统一奖励作弊检测基准 RH-Detect 并评测零样本检测器
arXiv
2610.10947
Published
Oct 8
Layer
Application layer
Setting
LLM applications
Evaluated models
Qwen 3.5 Flash, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, Grok 4.1 Fast and others7
- DefensesDetection and filtering
- RiskReward hacking
- ComponentGuardrails and judges
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.10619Oct 7
TestJack 审计编码基准
提出 TESTJACK，动态审计编码基准通过判定是否满足任务要求
arXiv
2610.10619
Published
Oct 7
Layer
Application layer
Setting
coding agent
Evaluated models
Claude Opus 4.6, Claude Opus 4.7, Claude Opus 4.8 and others7
- RiskReward hacking
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.09581Oct 7
研究审计 LLM 读取 Agent 日志的取证能力：答案正确但引用来源多为猜测
评测 LLM 审计 Agent 日志时来源重建是否有证据支持
arXiv
2610.09581
Published
Oct 7
Layer
Application layer
Setting
AI Agent
Evaluated models
gpt-5.6-luna, claude-sonnet-4-6, gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 and others5
- RiskHallucination and fabrication
Abstract保存执行范围的标识绑定，才能把猜中的引用和证据支持的引用分开。
包级审计检查保存的智能体动作里，哪些来源结论能被交给分析者的记录支持。
Paper analysisRead analysis
InterpretabilityarXiv 2610.09384Oct 7
人格层级模型解释微调 LLM 的上下文泛化
提出人格层级模型并设计 PPR 抑制奖励作弊的跨上下文泛化
arXiv
2610.09384
Published
Oct 7
Layer
Model layer
Setting
Models and APIs
Evaluated models
Qwen3-4B, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
- DefensesModel hardening
- RiskReward hacking
Abstract提出人格层级模型揭示微调跨上下文泛化规律，报告角色距离正相关性，通过 PPR 抑制 RL 作弊。
Paper analysisRead analysis
DefensesarXiv 2610.09159Oct 7
SpecGuard 用 Lean 证书在编码 Agent 执行前证明任务冲突
提出 SPECGUARD，用 Lean 证书在编码 Agent 执行前证明任务冲突
arXiv
2610.09159
Published
Oct 7
Layer
Application layer
Setting
coding agent
Evaluated models
GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Opus 5, Claude Fable 5 and others4
- RiskReward hacking
Abstract提出预执行冲突检测与证明框架，在多个基准和真实仓库中成功证明任务与测试不可同时满足。
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.08585Oct 6
研究：无关信息污染患者病历并干扰 LLM 临床推理
构建 MedDistract 基准，测量偶发信息对临床文书与推理的污染
arXiv
2610.08585
Published
Oct 6
Layer
Application layer
Setting
LLM applications
Evaluated models
GPT-5.4, GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Opus 5 and others9
- RiskHallucination and fabrication
- ComponentAudio
Paper analysisRead analysis
DefensesarXiv 2610.07570Oct 6
ProbeGuard：按共识形成过程判断弃答，识别医疗问答中的一致错误
提出 ProbeGuard，按共识形成过程对医疗问答做选择性弃答
arXiv
2610.07570
Published
Oct 6
Layer
Application layer
Setting
LLM applications
Evaluated models
Qwen3-8B, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, HuatuoGPT-o1-8B
- DefensesMonitoring and auditing
- RiskHallucination and fabrication
- ComponentMonitors
AbstractProbeGuard 用共识形成过程做可认证弃权，并在全票层分开答对与答错的共识。
ProbeGuard 是给多轮共识医学问答用的认证弃权框架：基板照原样作答，弃权只看共识是怎么形成的。
Paper analysisRead analysis
DefensesarXiv 2610.07276Oct 6
SAFESHIELD：小语言模型部署时安全的决策组织框架
提出 SAFESHIELD，组织小语言模型部署时的安全决策
arXiv
2610.07276
Published
Oct 6
Layer
Application layer
Setting
LLM applications
Evaluated models
Qwen3-4B-Instruct
- AttacksJailbreaks
- RiskHallucination and fabrication
- ComponentRAG
AbstractSAFESHIELD 用可审计决策轨迹组织 SLM 部署时的四项安全决策，并报告协调依赖影响端到端结果。
SAFESHIELD 是面向小语言模型的部署时安全框架，把运行时安全从单项审核改写成可检查的决策过程。
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.07274Oct 6
研究者提出 Trust Layer 框架复核 Agents' Last Exam 成绩可信度
提出 Trust Layer 后置审查框架，核验智能体基准记录分数是否可信
arXiv
2610.07274
Published
Oct 6
Layer
Application layer
Setting
AI Agent
Evaluated models
Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 5, GPT-5.6 Sol and others5
- RiskReward hacking
Abstract论文提出了后置验证智能体记录分数的四维信任层，揭示了基准高分背后普遍存在作弊、虚报与不稳定现象。
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.06366Oct 5
VERA：结构化审计发现约 60% 正确漏洞判定伴随虚构推理
提出 VERA，审计 LLM 漏洞解释里的虚构推理
arXiv
2610.06366
Published
Oct 5
Layer
Model layer
Setting
coding agent
Evaluated models
sonnet-5, gemma-4-26b, llama-4-maverick and others8
- RiskHallucination and fabrication
- ComponentReasoning chains
Paper analysisRead analysis
Analysis and theoryarXiv 2610.04860Oct 4
Research reveals that text watermarks induce model hallucinations and proposes two mitigation interventions
分析文本水印在 RAG 中诱发事实幻觉的机制并提出干预
arXiv
2610.04860
Published
Oct 4
Layer
Model layer
Setting
LLM applications
Evaluated models
LLaMA 3.1 8B Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3, Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct
- DefensesInference-time intervention
- RiskHallucination and fabrication
- ComponentRAG
Abstract论文揭示了生产环境文本水印导致模型事实退化的失效模式，分析了解码机制并提出针对性干预。
论文研究生产级文本水印对大语言模型事实准确性的影响，分析了水印诱发幻觉的失效模式并评估了针对性缓解方案。
Paper analysisRead analysis
Risky behaviorarXiv 2610.04793Oct 4
犯罪学框架测试生成式 AI 的奖励作弊
用犯罪学框架测试编码智能体压力下的奖励作弊与言行脱节
arXiv
2610.04793
Published
Oct 4
Layer
Application layer
Setting
coding agent
Evaluated models
Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Sonnet 5.5, GPT-5.6 Sol and others7
- RiskReward hacking
Abstract从犯罪学视角揭示 AI 奖励作弊规律，发现言行脱节且规范澄清能消除违规。
Paper analysisRead analysis
DefensesarXiv 2610.02999Oct 2
OmniConfess：用 Token 级「忏悔」缓解全模态幻觉
提出 OmniConfess，冻结候选并按通道重打分以缓解全模态幻觉
arXiv
2610.02999
Published
Oct 2
Layer
Model layer
Setting
Models and APIs
Evaluated models
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B, Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B, Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B
- DefensesInference-time intervention
- RiskHallucination and fabrication
- ComponentVision
Paper analysisRead analysis
DefensesarXiv 2610.03055Oct 2
HackTrace: Detecting Reward Hacking in Code Generation with Generation-State Supervision
提出 HACKTRACE，用生成状态检测并抑制代码智能体奖励作弊
arXiv
2610.03055
Published
Oct 2
Layer
Application layer
Setting
coding agent
Evaluated models
Qwen3-8B, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Qwen3.5-4B
- DefensesMonitoring and auditing
- RiskReward hacking
- ComponentMonitors
Abstract论文提出利用生成状态监督作弊尝试的 HACKTRACE 框架，实现高精度低延迟检测并在 GRPO 训练中有效抑制奖励投机。
Paper analysisRead analysis
OtherarXiv 2610.00902Oct 1
用平均场博弈分析 AI 安全：以 2026 年 7 月 Hugging Face 事件为例
用均值场博弈分析多智能体集体攻击何时不是均衡
arXiv
2610.00902
Published
Oct 1
Layer
Application layer
Setting
Multi-agent systems
- RiskDangerous agent actions
Abstract结构阈值给出干预杠杆。
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.00531Oct 1
SciSlopBench：评测并缓解 AI 生成论文中的科学灌水
构建 SciSlopBench 评测科学灌水，并用 SciSlopHarness 约束修订
arXiv
2610.00531
Published
Oct 1
Layer
Model layer
Setting
Models and APIs
- RiskHallucination and fabrication
Paper analysisRead analysis

AI Safety Daily

Read the latest issueOne issue per day, updated as events develop

All papers

Attack type

Model risks

Defense type

Impact

System type

Attack surface / entry point

Layer

System component

Reward hacking as a transmissible strategy in multi-agent coding systems

Paper reviews OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google agent safety incidents and proposes the PASAC framework

仅凭输出审查无法验证什么：面向研究智能体的研究契约

研究者提出可检查评分器与自改进 Agent 共同演化方法

RH-Detect：统一的奖励作弊检测基准发布

TestJack 审计编码基准

研究审计 LLM 读取 Agent 日志的取证能力：答案正确但引用来源多为猜测

人格层级模型解释微调 LLM 的上下文泛化

SpecGuard 用 Lean 证书在编码 Agent 执行前证明任务冲突

研究：无关信息污染患者病历并干扰 LLM 临床推理

ProbeGuard：按共识形成过程判断弃答，识别医疗问答中的一致错误

SAFESHIELD：小语言模型部署时安全的决策组织框架

研究者提出 Trust Layer 框架复核 Agents' Last Exam 成绩可信度

VERA：结构化审计发现约 60% 正确漏洞判定伴随虚构推理

Research reveals that text watermarks induce model hallucinations and proposes two mitigation interventions

犯罪学框架测试生成式 AI 的奖励作弊

OmniConfess：用 Token 级「忏悔」缓解全模态幻觉

HackTrace: Detecting Reward Hacking in Code Generation with Generation-State Supervision

用平均场博弈分析 AI 安全：以 2026 年 7 月 Hugging Face 事件为例

SciSlopBench：评测并缓解 AI 生成论文中的科学灌水