Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 10 papers

Another 232papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.12524

    An exploration of attacks on AI agent systems

    重测并扩展对 AI Agent 的提示注入,并用 Agent Card 欺骗操纵 A2A 选择

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Ollama Mistral 0.9.5, llama3-8b-8192, gemini-2.0-flash-lite and others5
    Abstract单智能体过滤与分类可被格式或措辞绕过,A2A 选卡还会偏向名称和描述。

    作者在自建的 LangChain、AutoGen 和 A2A 系统上重测提示注入,并改 Agent Card 看选择是否偏移。摘要称试验主要凸显单智能体弱点,同时把攻击扩到多智能体。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2610.04589

    StegoMemory red team testing: agent persistent memory can be used as a cross-session covert channel

    提出 StegoMemory,评测智能体持久记忆作为跨会话隐写信道

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Llama 3.1 405B, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o and others13

    Abstract研究揭示智能体持久记忆可作为隐蔽信道跨会话传输机密,写入持久化是主要防御瓶颈,呼吁建立记忆完整性防御。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2607.14493

    LogInject 框架披露 LLM 日志分析中的被动提示注入

    提出 LogInject 框架,评测日志分析中的被动提示注入及缓解

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Llama-3-70B-Instruct

    Abstract论文评估了 LLM 日志分析中的上下文污染风险,提出分片拼接等攻击与三层防御,指出必须结合架构隔离与人工介入。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2603.17239

    LAAF: A Systematic Red-Teaming Method and Automated Attack Framework for LPCI Vulnerabilities in Agentic LLM Systems

    Proposes LAAF, which automatically attacks LPCI vulnerabilities in agent systems in stages

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gemini-2.0-flash-001, claude-3-haiku-20240307, meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct and others5
    AbstractLAAF does LPCI red teaming with taxonomy plus stage seeding.

    The authors state that LAAF is an automated red-teaming framework built specifically for LPCI in agentic LLMs. The issue to address is that encoded, delayed, and conditionally triggered payloads can persist in memory or RAG and re-enter across sessions, whereas Garak and PyRIT do not use the previous round's breakthrough results to seed the next stage across the six stages.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2603.01414

    Jailbreaking embodied LLMs via action-level manipulation

    Propose Blindfold, jailbreaking embodied LLMs with action-level manipulation

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B, DeepSeek-R1-14B, Gemma-3-27B and others8
    AbstractBlindfold jailbreaks embodied LLMs with action-level proxy planning, and the authors claim it can bypass semantic checks and is effective in both simulation and real-world settings.

    Blindfold is a no-box attack against embodied LLM planning modules, rewriting malicious intent into seemingly benign action sequences.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2603.00131

    Thought Virus: viral misalignment induced by subliminal prompts in multi-agent systems

    Propose Thought Virus, which propagates preferences along multi-agent messages via subliminal prompts.

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
    AbstractThought Virus spreads a single-point bias downstream.

    Thought Virus puts subliminal prompting into multi-agent communication, to see whether a single-point deviation spreads across the network without naming the target concept.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2507.10457

    论文提出 LPCI:针对 Agent 逻辑层与持久记忆的提示控制注入攻击

    提出 LPCI,把延迟条件载荷写入记忆与检索库以跨会话触发

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    ChatGPT, Claude, LLaMA3 and others8
    Abstract作者定义 LPCI。

    作者把LPCI定义为针对智能体逻辑执行、记忆留存和工具集成的跨阶段漏洞类,而不是单次输入上的提示改写。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end