Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 15 papers

Another 215papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.12644

    Cancerous backdoor attack: progressive activation via invisible tokens and a stage controller.

    Proposes the Cancerous backdoor, which progressively corrupts reasoning using invisible stage tokens.

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3
    AbstractHidden tokens plus a stage controller make the backdoor progressively corrupt reasoning upon triggering, and the authors believe that looking only at the answer will miss it.

    Cancerous Backdoor Attack changes LLM backdoors from one-time activation to multi-stage reasoning corruption that accumulates progressively with triggers.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2610.04985

    研究揭示 Jev 作为应用决策层的安全与隐私风险

    评估应用决策层的输入注入与隐私推断风险

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Jev, NanoJev
    AbstractJev 的类型化决策可被输入与训练操纵,也会泄露信息,并同时支持检测与滥用。

    Jev 是 TypeSafe 的 System One 模型,把应用 state 和固定问题变成 Choice、Noul 或 Score 的类型化决策与概率。作者用官方 API 和可改训练的 NanoJev,考察它作为决策层时的操纵、泄露与双重用途。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2609.27542

    Researchers use control token injection to delete gpt-oss-20b's reasoning chain and bypass chain-of-thought monitoring

    提出控制标记注入,清空工具 Agent 的思维链以绕过推理监控

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    openai/gpt-oss-20b, google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it, deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B and others4

    Abstract论文阐明控制标记注入可抑制 CoT 使监控失效并促成拒绝绕过,且工具执行受解析器宽容度影响。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2609.19722

    ALIBI:向二进制注入虚假安全叙事可让 LLM 恶意软件分析器误判

    提出 ALIBI,向恶意二进制注入不执行掩护叙事使分析器误判为良性

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Gemini 2.5 Pro, GPT-5.5 Pro, Claude Opus 4.7
    AbstractALIBI 用二进制内的掩护叙事重释可疑静态证据,Gemini 上翻转多,另两模型主要为降级。

    ALIBI 是针对 LLM 恶意软件分诊的语义掩护叙事攻击:不覆盖系统指令,而把仍可见的可疑静态证据重释成良性安全产品的预期行为。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2607.14493

    LogInject 框架披露 LLM 日志分析中的被动提示注入

    提出 LogInject 框架,评测日志分析中的被动提示注入及缓解

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Llama-3-70B-Instruct

    Abstract论文评估了 LLM 日志分析中的上下文污染风险,提出分片拼接等攻击与三层防御,指出必须结合架构隔离与人工介入。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2605.24421

    研究者提出日志型提示注入攻击,可抑制 SOC 中 LLM 分析助手的恶意日志识别

    提出日志基底提示注入,操纵 SOC 分析员的分类、摘要与处置建议

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gpt-4o-mini

    Abstract在 gpt-4o-mini 上,人格劫持与上下文操纵可改写 SOC 分析输出,直接覆盖在分类上无效。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2602.07379

    Aegis: Governance, Integrity, and Security for AI Voice Agents

    Proposes the Aegis red-teaming framework for multi-turn attacks on high-risk voice agents.

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, Gemini-1.5 Pro and others7
    AbstractAegis red-teams three types of voice agents: query-based access eliminates authentication and leakage successes, but behavioral attacks remain.

    Aegis uses multi-turn red-teaming evaluation on ALLM voice agents already integrated into business systems. The authors call this the first systematic red-teaming framework in this setting.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. AttacksarXiv 2602.05484

    Masked Mirror: Covert Prompt Injection Attacks Against LLM-Based Phishing Detection

    提出隐蔽提示注入攻击 LLM 钓鱼检测器,并给出防御 InjectDefuser

    Published
    Evaluated models
    OpenAI GPT-5, xAI Grok 4 Fast (Non-Reasoning), Meta Llama 4 Maverick and others4
    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. AttacksarXiv 2601.21360

    Compliance Paradox: Semantic-Instruction Decoupling in Automated Academic Code Evaluation

    提出 AST-ASIP ,把对抗指令植入编译器忽略区域以劫持代码评分

    Published
    Evaluated models
    DeepSeek-V3.2, Qwen3-235B, GPT-OSS-120B and others9
    Abstract作者称 RLHF 的服从性使评分脱离代码。

    这篇工作把自动代码评分中的失败称为 Compliance Paradox:评分模型可以离开提交逻辑,转而执行嵌在可编译代码里的隐藏指令。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. AttacksarXiv 2601.22169

    In Vino Veritas and Vulnerabilities:用醉酒语言诱导检验 LLM 安全

    用醉酒语言诱导改编对话模型并评测越狱与隐私泄露

    Published
    Evaluated models
    LLaMA2-7B, LLaMA3-8B, Mistral-7B and others5
    Abstract醉酒语言诱导在五个 LLM 上抬高越狱与部分隐私错误,作者将其视为攻击向量。

    作者把醉酒语言当作攻击向量,检验把 LLM 适配成醉酒发短信的模式后,越狱和情境隐私是否变差。动机是人类醉酒时的失范与泄密,以及 LLM 模拟人设的能力。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. AttacksarXiv 2509.25624

    STAC:看似无害的工具调用链如何攻破 LLM Agent

    提出 STAC 框架,把恶意目标拆成多轮看似无害的工具调用链

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4.1-2025-04-14, GPT-4.1-mini-2025-04-14, Qwen3-32B and others8

    Abstract作者提出并验证了智能体在序列化工具攻击下的普遍脆弱性,指出针对累积动作序列防御的必要性。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. AttacksarXiv 2509.22040

    研究:通过编码规则文件对Cursor与GitHub Copilot实施提示注入

    通过规则文件提示注入劫持编码编辑器并执行未授权终端命令

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Claude 4 Sonnet and others4

    Abstract论文提出了针对代码编辑器的提示注入评估框架 AIShellJack,实验显示攻击能诱导 AI 执行未授权终端命令。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end