Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 333 papers
Filter2
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 265papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 265papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. DistressBench: Evaluating multi-dimensional crisis support in large language models

    Introduces DistressBench, evaluating models' multidimensional support in crisis conversations

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Muse Spark 1.2, Muse Spark 1.3, Muse Glimmer 30B and others20
    AbstractThe model is more restrained and acts less.

    DistressBench uses SSH dialogues written and revised by clinical personnel, and evaluates how much necessary care general chat models deliver according to weighted atomic criteria, rather than whether they refuse. When users disclose suicidal ideation or self-harm to a chat model, the authors consider the expected behavior to be recognizing the crisis, calibrating empathy, de-escalating, and referring to human help. Refusal-based evaluations cannot detect failing to act after recognizing the crisis.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. SWE-Duel: Toward a Self-Expanding Arena for Coding Agents

    Proposes SWE-Duel, which lets coding agents mutually evaluate, create problems, and blindly review fixes during evaluation.

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.8, Kimi K2.7 Code and others11
    AbstractThe mutual evaluation arena creates questions during evaluation.

    SWE-Duel is a coding agent arena that generates tasks and judges only at evaluation time, to avoid leakage and saturation of static benchmarks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. The paper proposes the ISE framework to evaluate LLM agents' epistemic humility under knowledge conflicts

    Proposes the ISE framework to evaluate the epistemic humility of LLM agents under knowledge conflicts

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Nemotron-Orchestrator-8B, Claude Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5 and others5
    AbstractISE trajectory evaluations show that high task accuracy across four agents does not correspond to higher cognitive humility.

    What the authors want to test is not whether the agent's final answer is correct, but whether, when a knowledge conflict arises, it recognizes the gap in its trajectory, performs bounded tool follow-up, and writes the unresolved uncertainty to the user.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. 研究提出 Agent 安全新维度:识别未履行的安全义务

    提出义务识别基准 ObligationBench,并训练护栏识别 Agent 未履行的安全义务

    Published
    Evaluated models
    ObligationGuard, Claude-Opus-4.8, GPT-5.6-Sol and others17
    Abstract义务是护栏缺口。

    作者认为编码智能体的安全不能只靠拦截禁止动作,还要找出终止时仍未做的安全关键动作,并将其称为义务。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. MH-INDIC:面向印度城市与半城市语境孕产妇健康 LLM 交互的文化对齐评估框架

    提出 MH-INDIC,评测印度语境母婴健康 LLM 交互的文化对齐

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5, Gemini 3 Pro and others10
    Abstract作者称模型可接近人群均值,但画像变异低于人类,人类分数条件可改善对话。

    MH-INDIC 是面向城市与半城市北印度母婴互动的多维文化对齐评测。 它关心的不是医学事实是否正确,而是回复是否沿家庭权威、性别期待和情绪披露来推理。做法是把 Hofstede 六维改写到互动层,再加入 MAFC、BTB、SVO、MHS。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. SSCBench:评估工具调用 LLM Agent 故障注入测试证据有效性的测量协议与基准

    提出 SSCBench,评测工具调用 Agent 故障注入测试的证据有效性

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    deepseek-flash, deepseek-v4-pro, gpt-5.6-luna and others5
    Abstract解释采纳前应报告该次执行的证据条件,以及支撑该主张的观察总体。

    SSCBench 研究工具使用智能体的故障注入结果,在什么证据条件下可以被解释。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. BeliefScope:区分证据与用户压力对模型信念影响的受控框架

    用 BeliefScope 分离固定命题上证据与压力对模型信念的影响

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-8B, Llama3.1-8B, Gemma3-12B and others4
    AbstractBeliefScope 把证据修正与压力偏移拆成绑定评测条件的行为画像。

    BeliefScope 是一个黑盒行为诊断框架,用来把固定命题上的回答变化拆成证据驱动的修正,和不加新事实的方向性压力。信念修正评测能看到信息基础变化后的更新,谄媚评测能看到用户影响下的顺从或漂移。作者认为,当两种输入都偏向同一结论时,表面偏移本身不能区分来源。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. PatchBench 提出激活补丁局部评测协议,揭示越狱修复的附带损伤

    提出 PatchBench-Local 协议,评测激活补丁修复越狱的局部附带损伤

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct, gemma-3-4b-it and others8

    Abstract论文提出 PatchBench 与局部评估协议,揭示了激活补丁在全局能力无损下仍存局部良性退化。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. The paper points out that the reliability of LLM vulnerability repair benchmarks is affected by evaluation design.

    用对照实验隔离评测设计对漏洞补丁基准得分的影响

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude Sonnet 4.0, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Claude Opus 4.7
    Abstract作者认为评测流水线会改变补丁基准分数,PoC 通过率高于开发者测试通过率。

    作者把 LLM 漏洞补丁基准的评测流水线当作会改变测量结果的对象,并明确说本文不是再做一个用于排名的基准。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. 研究:Agent 更依赖工具报错通道

    测量工具调用 Agent 对显式报错与静默损坏的检测和恢复

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    claude-haiku-4.5-thinking, claude-haiku-4.5, deepseek-r1 and others6
    Abstract作者称智能体看错误通道而非返回内容,静默损坏更少被当作问题。

    作者在 BFCL 多轮可执行环境上注入一次工具层故障,把注意到、改计划、恢复和重复分开记分,而不是只看任务有没有做完。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. AgentTime 基准测试智能体时长遵循能力,GPT-6 Astra 出现 14 次做完后休眠

    提出 AgentTime 基准,评测智能体按时长工作与估时能力

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Fable 5.1, GPT-5.6 Sol, GPT-6 Astra and others7
    Abstract作者把完成任务和管理所用时间分开。

    AgentTime 是对智能体时间自控的评测:预测任务耗时、按要求时长工作、事后估计已用时间。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. 研究审计 LLM 读取 Agent 日志的取证能力:答案正确但引用来源多为猜测

    评测 LLM 审计 Agent 日志时来源重建是否有证据支持

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gpt-5.6-luna, claude-sonnet-4-6, gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 and others5
    Abstract保存执行范围的标识绑定,才能把猜中的引用和证据支持的引用分开。

    包级审计检查保存的智能体动作里,哪些来源结论能被交给分析者的记录支持。

    Paper analysisRead analysis