Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 213papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
AbstractThe authors say that collaboration changes takeoff from an individual capability threshold to a population threshold, so small-population evaluations are insufficient.
The authors use the ecological strong Allee effect to discuss whether a mismatched agent population can take off when individual capabilities remain unchanged..
AbstractThe authors claim HarmBench does not correspond to a single harmful refusal, and behaviors should be separated when comparing models.
This is a construct validity audit of HarmBench in HELM Safety, examining whether harmful refusal can be read as a single attribute when interpreting scores.
AbstractAcross five models, many correct verdicts are largely unchanged by deleting or replacing negation rules.
Use behavioral counterfactuals and activation probes to audit whether compliance rulings rely on the given rules. The authors aim to separate two kinds of seemingly identical correct rulings: those that use the given rules, and those obtained from case surface features or training patterns.
AbstractThe authors claim that comparing judges should look at T, not just accuracy.
The authors audit whether LLM-as-a-Judge decisions can still be treated as actionable ground truth under repeated queries, swapped candidate order, and changed prompt formats.