Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 10 papers

Another 265papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. SinoGlyphBench:中文字形混淆下语言模型审核的诊断基准

    提出 SinoGlyphBench,用配对字形混淆诊断中文审核稳定性

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.4 mini, GPT-5.5, DeepSeek V4 Flash and others12
    AbstractSinoGlyphBench 显示中文字形混淆会同时增加有害漏报和误报,全文扰动最重。

    SinoGlyphBench是一个配对诊断基准,用来看内容审核在可还原的中文字形混淆下是否还保持原决定。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2607.14493

    LogInject 框架披露 LLM 日志分析中的被动提示注入

    提出 LogInject 框架,评测日志分析中的被动提示注入及缓解

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Llama-3-70B-Instruct

    Abstract论文评估了 LLM 日志分析中的上下文污染风险,提出分片拼接等攻击与三层防御,指出必须结合架构隔离与人工介入。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2606.09700

    研究者提出 HPAA 攻击:用排版视觉线索绕过 13 个内容审核系统

    提出 HPAA 攻击,用排版视觉线索绕过内容审核系统

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Llama-Guard-3-8B, Perspective API, ShieldGemma-2B and others13
    Abstract揭示了排版视觉线索与分词差异带来的审核盲区,HPAA 以极低查询实现近乎完全规避。

    这篇论文研究了人类视觉感知与大模型分词处理机制之间的差异所导致的内容审核漏洞。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2603.17239

    LAAF: A Systematic Red-Teaming Method and Automated Attack Framework for LPCI Vulnerabilities in Agentic LLM Systems

    提出 LAAF,分阶段自动攻击智能体系统的 LPCI 漏洞

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gemini-2.0-flash-001, claude-3-haiku-20240307, meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct and others5
    AbstractLAAF does LPCI red teaming with taxonomy plus stage seeding.

    The authors state that LAAF is an automated red-teaming framework built specifically for LPCI in agentic LLMs. The issue to address is that encoded, delayed, and conditionally triggered payloads can persist in memory or RAG and re-enter across sessions, whereas Garak and PyRIT do not use the previous round's breakthrough results to seed the next stage across the six stages.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2603.00131

    Thought Virus:多 Agent 系统中潜意识提示引发的病毒式失准

    提出 Thought Virus,经潜意识提示使偏好沿多 Agent 消息传播

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
    AbstractThought Virus 把单点偏差传到下游。

    Thought Virus 把 subliminal prompting 放进多智能体通信,看单点偏差会不会在不点名目标概念时传到全网。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2602.18514

    招聘中的特洛伊木马:标准模型与推理模型间接提示注入的红队测试案例研究

    用简历中的不可见指令做间接提示注入,操纵招聘推荐

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen 3 30B A3B Instruct 2507, Qwen 3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

    Abstract作者称推理在简单注入下会帮攻击圆谎,在不合逻辑的复杂注入下又会把欺骗漏出来。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2601.21360

    Compliance Paradox: Semantic-Instruction Decoupling in Automated Academic Code Evaluation

    提出 AST-ASIP ,把对抗指令植入编译器忽略区域以劫持代码评分

    Published
    Evaluated models
    DeepSeek-V3.2, Qwen3-235B, GPT-OSS-120B and others9
    Abstract作者称 RLHF 的服从性使评分脱离代码。

    这篇工作把自动代码评分中的失败称为 Compliance Paradox:评分模型可以离开提交逻辑,转而执行嵌在可编译代码里的隐藏指令。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end