Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 10 papers
Filter5

Attack type

Prompt injection3Poisoning and backdoors3

Attack technique

Gradient and representation optimization8Automated search4Encoding and obfuscation5Role-play and persuasion6Conversation structure manipulation2Defense-targeted7Dormant triggers14

Impact

Harmful content32Output manipulation10

System type

Models and APIs7

Attack surface / entry point

User input8Documents and messages3Retrieval corpus5Images, audio and video24Training data3Weights and gradients2

Layer

Model layer3Application layer3
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 233papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack technique：Gradient and representation optimizationAttack technique：Conversation structure manipulationImpact：Output manipulationAttack surface / entry point：User inputAttack surface / entry point：Weights and gradientsClear all

Another 233papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.12644

    Cancerous backdoor attack: progressive activation via invisible tokens and a stage controller.

    Proposes the Cancerous backdoor, which progressively corrupts reasoning using invisible stage tokens.

    arXiv
    2610.12644
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3
    AbstractHidden tokens plus a stage controller make the backdoor progressively corrupt reasoning upon triggering, and the authors believe that looking only at the answer will miss it.

    Cancerous Backdoor Attack changes LLM backdoors from one-time activation to multi-stage reasoning corruption that accumulates progressively with triggers.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2610.09027

    P-VMI：对抗图像经 KV cache 持续影响多轮对话

    提出持久视觉记忆注入，使对抗图像经缓存在触发时操控输出

    arXiv
    2610.09027
    Published
    Layer
    Infrastructure layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-8B, Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct, Gemma-4-12B

    Abstract论文提出 P-VMI，证实对抗输入被掩蔽后仍可经 KV 缓存持久控制模型，强调了保留状态的安全风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2610.05894

    研究者提出闭环偏见注入攻击

    提出闭环激活引导，在扩散语言模型去噪过程中注入定向偏见

    arXiv
    2610.05894
    Published
    Layer
    Model layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Attacker
    Gray-box
    Evaluated models
    LLaDA-8B-Instruct, Dream-v0-Instruct-7B, LLaDA-MoE-7B-A1B-Instruct

    Abstract通过去噪中间概率反馈动态调节残差流转向，证明扩散语言模型在推理服务栈中存在闭环偏见注入脆弱性。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2610.04985

    研究揭示 Jev 作为应用决策层的安全与隐私风险

    评估应用决策层的输入注入与隐私推断风险

    arXiv
    2610.04985
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Attacker
    Black-box, Gray-box
    Evaluated models
    Jev, NanoJev
    AbstractJev 的类型化决策可被输入与训练操纵，也会泄露信息，并同时支持检测与滥用。

    Jev 是 TypeSafe 的 System One 模型，把应用 state 和固定问题变成 Choice、Noul 或 Score 的类型化决策与概率。作者用官方 API 和可改训练的 NanoJev，考察它作为决策层时的操纵、泄露与双重用途。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2610.03430

    JIL：通过对抗后缀操纵 LLM 请求调度优先级

    提出 JIL 对抗后缀，压低长度预测以抬高请求调度优先级

    arXiv
    2610.03430
    Published
    Layer
    Infrastructure layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3-8B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 and others4
    AbstractJIL 用对抗后缀压低长度预测，在预测式 LLM 调度中提高自身优先级。

    JIL 是对预测式 LLM 调度的攻击：用对抗后缀压低长度预测，使请求在 SRPT 式队列里更早得到服务。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. AttacksarXiv 2602.17837

    TFL: Targeted Bit-Flip Attack against Large Language Models

    提出 TFL 定向比特翻转，使选定提示输出虚假答案且无关查询保持正确

    arXiv
    2602.17837
    Published
    Layer
    Model layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-8B, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B, LLaMA-3.1-8B-INSTRUCT
    AbstractTFL 在三个 LLM 上搜索权重比特，使指定提示出现目标关键词，并约束无关任务下降。

    TFL 是对 LLM 主存权重的目标比特翻转框架：攻击者要让选定提示输出指定虚假答案关键词，同时限制无关查询上的降质。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. AttacksarXiv 2601.06464

    Adversarial Robustness of 3D Large Vision-Language Models

    提出 Vision 与 Caption 攻击，扰动点云操纵 3D VLM 输出

    arXiv
    2601.06464
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    PointLLM-7B, GPT4Point-2.7B
    Abstract作者用两类白盒攻击评估 3D VLM，称无目标更易成功、定向更难。

    对 point-based 3D VLM 的白盒对抗鲁棒性评测。 作者关心驾驶、机器人等场景里，小几何扰动能否改写类别或描述，以及定向诱导特定输出是否像 2D 那样容易。方法上，Vision Attack 用余弦相似度推远原视觉 token，或拉向另一点云的特征。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end