Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 15 papers

Another 254papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2607.14493

    LogInject 框架披露 LLM 日志分析中的被动提示注入

    提出 LogInject 框架,评测日志分析中的被动提示注入及缓解

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Llama-3-70B-Instruct

    Abstract论文评估了 LLM 日志分析中的上下文污染风险,提出分片拼接等攻击与三层防御,指出必须结合架构隔离与人工介入。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2606.12716

    PaperGuard:针对多模态 AI 同行评审的攻击与防御基准

    提出 PaperGuard,用图文注入与梯度扰动抬高自动审稿分数并检测恶意指令

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude-sonnet-4.5, GPT-4o, GPT-4.1 and others11
    AbstractPaperGuard 测到提示注入与白盒视觉抬分,并比较分块检索防御。

    PaperGuard同时评测并检测多模态 AI 审稿中的评分操纵。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2606.11265

    论文提出 CRCP 投毒框架,揭示 RAG 分块与重排序下的投毒失效问题

    提出 CRCP 框架,优化分块与重排下的 RAG 语料投毒

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, DeepSeek-R1, Qwen3-Max and others11
    AbstractCRCP 把投毒做成多阶段一致性问题。

    CRCP 研究的是带分块和重排的 RAG 语料投毒,而不是只提高文档级检索分数。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2605.28074

    SilentRetrieval: Hijacking retrieval-augmented generation with semantically preserved adversarial data poisoning

    提出 SilentRetrieval,以语义保持对抗文档投毒劫持 RAG 检索与生成

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-2-7B-Chat, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2, Qwen-7B-Chat and others10
    Abstract两阶段投毒在单文档协议下兼顾检索劫持、生成操纵与近良性困惑度。

    SilentRetrieval 是针对 RAG 的两阶段语料投毒,在每查询一篇、合成目标答案的统一协议下,同时处理检索劫持、生成操纵和流畅度。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2603.17239

    LAAF: A Systematic Red-Teaming Method and Automated Attack Framework for LPCI Vulnerabilities in Agentic LLM Systems

    提出 LAAF,分阶段自动攻击智能体系统的 LPCI 漏洞

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gemini-2.0-flash-001, claude-3-haiku-20240307, meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct and others5
    AbstractLAAF does LPCI red teaming with taxonomy plus stage seeding.

    The authors state that LAAF is an automated red-teaming framework built specifically for LPCI in agentic LLMs. The issue to address is that encoded, delayed, and conditionally triggered payloads can persist in memory or RAG and re-enter across sessions, whereas Garak and PyRIT do not use the previous round's breakthrough results to seed the next stage across the six stages.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2603.16960

    针对现代视觉语言模型的对抗攻击

    对开源视觉购物智能体实施商品图对抗攻击并诱导买错

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    LLaVA-v1.5-7B, Qwen2.5-VL-7B
    Abstract作者称 LLaVA 易被三种攻击诱导买错,Qwen 正确购买率仍接近其干净条件。

    作者在自建电商环境里比较两个开源 VLM 购物智能体对图像对抗扰动的鲁棒性。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2603.00131

    Thought Virus:多 Agent 系统中潜意识提示引发的病毒式失准

    提出 Thought Virus,经潜意识提示使偏好沿多 Agent 消息传播

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
    AbstractThought Virus 把单点偏差传到下游。

    Thought Virus 把 subliminal prompting 放进多智能体通信,看单点偏差会不会在不点名目标概念时传到全网。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. AttacksarXiv 2602.18514

    招聘中的特洛伊木马:标准模型与推理模型间接提示注入的红队测试案例研究

    用简历中的不可见指令做间接提示注入,操纵招聘推荐

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen 3 30B A3B Instruct 2507, Qwen 3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

    Abstract作者称推理在简单注入下会帮攻击圆谎,在不合逻辑的复杂注入下又会把欺骗漏出来。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. AttacksarXiv 2602.00364

    "Someone hid it": Query-agnostic black-box attacks against LLM retrieval

    提出查询无关黑盒攻击 DQ-A,用可迁移文末后缀降低文档检索排名

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen-1.5-7B-Instruct, SFR-Embedding-Mistral, E5-Mistral-7B-Instruct and others10
    AbstractDQ-A 以无查询黑盒后缀压低 LLM 检索排名,并在 BRIGHT 上比较三种基线。

    DQ-A 是一种 query-agnostic、complete black-box 的文档隐藏攻击,对象是用最后隐层相似度匹配的 LLM 检索。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. AttacksarXiv 2601.21360

    Compliance Paradox: Semantic-Instruction Decoupling in Automated Academic Code Evaluation

    提出 AST-ASIP ,把对抗指令植入编译器忽略区域以劫持代码评分

    Published
    Evaluated models
    DeepSeek-V3.2, Qwen3-235B, GPT-OSS-120B and others9
    Abstract作者称 RLHF 的服从性使评分脱离代码。

    这篇工作把自动代码评分中的失败称为 Compliance Paradox:评分模型可以离开提交逻辑,转而执行嵌在可编译代码里的隐藏指令。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end