Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 28 papers

Another 240papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.07645

    SkillPoison:用成功经验投毒自进化 Agent 的技能形成

    提出 SkillPoison,用局部有效的成功经验诱导自进化 Agent 形成过度泛化技能

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    deepseek-v4-flash, Qwen V3.8 Flash, GPT-5.5
    AbstractSkillPoison 通过局部有效且验证成功的经验诱导技能过度泛化,在多个评测基准上实现了持久的下游攻击影响。

    SkillPoison 提出了一种针对自进化智能体经验到技能形成过程的攻击范式,通过组织已验证的成功经验诱导技能过度泛化。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2610.04985

    研究揭示 Jev 作为应用决策层的安全与隐私风险

    评估应用决策层的输入注入与隐私推断风险

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Jev, NanoJev
    AbstractJev 的类型化决策可被输入与训练操纵,也会泄露信息,并同时支持检测与滥用。

    Jev 是 TypeSafe 的 System One 模型,把应用 state 和固定问题变成 Choice、Noul 或 Score 的类型化决策与概率。作者用官方 API 和可改训练的 NanoJev,考察它作为决策层时的操纵、泄露与双重用途。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. DefensesarXiv 2610.04412

    论文研究 LLM 数字孪生参与增强民主时的提示注入脆弱性

    提出检测、结构化与 GSPO 流程,降低共识生成的提示注入错位

    Published
    Evaluated models
    LLaMA-2 7B, LLaMA-3 8B, GPT 3.5 Turbo and others14
    Abstract三章依次做个体偏好预测、政党知识图谱审议,以及共识生成对提示注入的脆弱性与一条防御流程。

    这是一篇把 LLM 数字孪生放进增强民主的博士论文,分个体表示、政党聚合和共识生成的提示注入三章。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. DefensesarXiv 2610.02432

    论文提出 LLM 输入扰动鲁棒性度量,并发布 ASA 攻击与 AttestMCP 防护

    提出 ASA 与 AttestMCP,度量并降低 LLM 对输入序列扰动的敏感

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Gemma-3-27B-Instruct, Gemma-3-4B-Instruct, Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct and others12
    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. MADBench:多智能体辩论安全性评测基准发布

    提出 MADBench,评测多智能体辩论是吸收还是放大对抗影响

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gpt-4o, GPT-5, GPT-6 Astra
    AbstractMADBench 显示辩论能吸收部分准确率攻击,同时放大未授权读写。

    MADBench 是一个评测多智能体辩论安全性的基准,用来看攻击是被辩论吸收还是被放大。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2609.38270

    VirusCascade:劫持 LLM 推荐智能体的协同反思机制

    提出 VirusCascade,联合操纵商品描述与交互轨迹以劫持推荐智能体协同反思

    Published
    Evaluated models
    AgentCF, AgentSEQ, AgentRAG and others4
    Abstract作者把反思写回视为推广攻击入口,并用联合操纵和诊断探针研究其持续与传播。

    VirusCascade 是针对推荐智能体协作反思的 black-box targeted promotion 攻击研究。 攻击者只改商品描述和少量账号的普通交互,试图让目标商品获得更多良性用户曝光。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2609.37468

    论文提出针对 Agentic RAG 的检索器后门攻击与 DOU 隐藏方法

    提出检索器后门攻击操纵智能体搜索,并用 DOU 逃避检测

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    E5, Contriever-MSMARCO

    Abstract论文展示了通过恶意检索器操纵智能体多轮搜索并利用诱饵重塑表征隐蔽后门的可行性与系统风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. Abstract论文系统研究了智能体 C/R 的安全性,分析了合法回滚破坏执行连续性的机理,并实证评估了其普遍性与危害。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. 多智能体协同过滤系统的连接性攻击与防御研究

    复现 AgentCF 上的多智能体攻防并刻画连通性作用

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-235B-A22B, Claude Haiku 4.5, Mixtral 8×7B and others4
    Abstract连通性沿 k 与ρ改变攻防,且用户/物品与早期/稳态需要分开看。

    作者在 AgentCF 上研究连通性如何改变多智能体协同过滤的攻防,复现已有方法而不是提出新载荷。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. AttacksarXiv 2603.17239

    LAAF: A Systematic Red-Teaming Method and Automated Attack Framework for LPCI Vulnerabilities in Agentic LLM Systems

    Proposes LAAF, which automatically attacks LPCI vulnerabilities in agent systems in stages

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gemini-2.0-flash-001, claude-3-haiku-20240307, meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct and others5
    AbstractLAAF does LPCI red teaming with taxonomy plus stage seeding.

    The authors state that LAAF is an automated red-teaming framework built specifically for LPCI in agentic LLMs. The issue to address is that encoded, delayed, and conditionally triggered payloads can persist in memory or RAG and re-enter across sessions, whereas Garak and PyRIT do not use the previous round's breakthrough results to seed the next stage across the six stages.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. DefensesarXiv 2603.04474

    From Spark to Wildfire: Modeling and Mitigating Error Cascades in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaboration

    Proposing a lineage-graph governance layer to suppress error cascades in multi-agent collaboration

    Published
    AbstractA single seed can solidify into a false consensus along a fixed collaboration graph.

    The authors turn "small errors becoming collective false consensus" in LLM-MAS into a measurable propagation on a graph, and use a plug-in that only changes messages, not topology, to reduce the final infection.

    Paper analysisRead analysis