Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 131 papers
Filter5
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 233papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 233papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. Space beats statistics, retraining beats ranking: auditing training labels under label-only backdoors

    Auditing training labels for label-only backdoors, comparing spaces and statistics, and judging by retraining

    Published
    Evaluated models
    ResNet-32
    AbstractLabel inspection must be done in a space that has not been fitted to these labels, and judged by retrained models rather than detection scores.

    The authors ask: can a defender without trusted data decide which training labels to keep, and how much clean data this destroys, and what the final model accuracy is.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2610.12644

    Cancerous backdoor attack: progressive activation via invisible tokens and a stage controller.

    Proposes the Cancerous backdoor, which progressively corrupts reasoning using invisible stage tokens.

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3
    AbstractHidden tokens plus a stage controller make the backdoor progressively corrupt reasoning upon triggering, and the authors believe that looking only at the answer will miss it.

    Cancerous Backdoor Attack changes LLM backdoors from one-time activation to multi-stage reasoning corruption that accumulates progressively with triggers.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. DefensesarXiv 2610.11634

    LTBD:用可学习信任边界分隔符防御提示注入

    提出 LTBD,用可学习分隔符隔离可信指令与不可信数据

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama3-8B-Instruct, Llama3.1-8B-Instruct, Falcon3-7B-Instruct and others4
    AbstractLTBD 只训练四个分隔符嵌入。

    LTBD 是一种不改基座权重的提示注入防御:只学习用来标出可信指令与不可信数据边界的四个 token 嵌入。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. EpiReal-Bench:商用图像生成模型虚假声明红队基准

    构建 EpiReal-Bench,评测图像生成器将虚假主张渲染为可信证据

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    GPT-Image-2, Nano Banana 2, Grok Imagen 2.0 and others4
    Abstract四款商用图像模型能把假主张画成可信证据。

    EpiReal-Bench 用来量商用图像生成器会不会把虚假现实主张画成可信视觉证据。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. PatchBench 提出激活补丁局部评测协议,揭示越狱修复的附带损伤

    提出 PatchBench-Local 协议,评测激活补丁修复越狱的局部附带损伤

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct, gemma-3-4b-it and others8

    Abstract论文提出 PatchBench 与局部评估协议,揭示了激活补丁在全局能力无损下仍存局部良性退化。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. DefensesarXiv 2610.09941

    OrthoPurify 用一步正交投影净化被后门污染的视觉语言模型

    提出 OrthoPurify,用正交投影清除视觉语言模型适配器中的劫持方向

    Published
    Evaluated models
    LLaVA-1.5-7B, Qwen3-VL-8B, LLaVA-1.5-13B and others5
    Abstract一次投影去掉劫持方向。

    OrthoPurify 是部署前的 LVLM 后门净化方法,用一次正交投影去掉被劫持的权重更新方向。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2610.09027

    P-VMI:对抗图像经 KV cache 持续影响多轮对话

    提出持久视觉记忆注入,使对抗图像经缓存在触发时操控输出

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-8B, Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct, Gemma-4-12B

    Abstract论文提出 P-VMI,证实对抗输入被掩蔽后仍可经 KV 缓存持久控制模型,强调了保留状态的安全风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. AttacksarXiv 2610.05793

    研究者训练出按多智能体拓扑触发的代码后门模型

    提出拓扑条件后门,使代码模型在推断多智能体部署时植入漏洞

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct

    Abstract论文证实了拓扑条件后门的可训练性与泛化性,展示了常规评测盲区,并提出差异化拓扑审计作为检测防御方向。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. AttacksarXiv 2610.05266

    论文披露主动式智能体的服务方间接提示注入攻击

    提出服务方间接提示注入,把主动智能体的决策协助转向预选目标

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5, Claude Opus 4.6, Gemini 3 Pro and others7
    Abstract提供者侧间接注入用 T–B–S 把主动协助转向外部目标,并在三环境中提高模拟用户授权。

    外部提供者只控制与自身目标关联的内容,就可以把良性主动个人智能体的协助转向该目标。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. AttacksarXiv 2610.04985

    研究揭示 Jev 作为应用决策层的安全与隐私风险

    评估应用决策层的输入注入与隐私推断风险

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Jev, NanoJev
    AbstractJev 的类型化决策可被输入与训练操纵,也会泄露信息,并同时支持检测与滥用。

    Jev 是 TypeSafe 的 System One 模型,把应用 state 和固定问题变成 Choice、Noul 或 Score 的类型化决策与概率。作者用官方 API 和可改训练的 NanoJev,考察它作为决策层时的操纵、泄露与双重用途。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. DefensesarXiv 2610.04412

    论文研究 LLM 数字孪生参与增强民主时的提示注入脆弱性

    提出检测、结构化与 GSPO 流程,降低共识生成的提示注入错位

    Published
    Evaluated models
    LLaMA-2 7B, LLaMA-3 8B, GPT 3.5 Turbo and others14
    Abstract三章依次做个体偏好预测、政党知识图谱审议,以及共识生成对提示注入的脆弱性与一条防御流程。

    这是一篇把 LLM 数字孪生放进增强民主的博士论文,分个体表示、政党聚合和共识生成的提示注入三章。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. AttacksarXiv 2610.03430

    JIL:通过对抗后缀操纵 LLM 请求调度优先级

    提出 JIL 对抗后缀,压低长度预测以抬高请求调度优先级

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3-8B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 and others4
    AbstractJIL 用对抗后缀压低长度预测,在预测式 LLM 调度中提高自身优先级。

    JIL 是对预测式 LLM 调度的攻击:用对抗后缀压低长度预测,使请求在 SRPT 式队列里更早得到服务。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  13. 研究揭示无触发投毒审计缺口:事实答对不等于决策正确

    揭示无触发虚假训练下事实回答与下游决策的审计差距

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-0.5B, Qwen2.5-1.5B, Qwen2.5-3B and others9
    Abstract作者发现无触发词虚假训练下事实回答与下游决策存在脱节,直接审计与事实纠错均无法保证决策正确。

    论文是一项针对语言模型在无触发词虚假信息训练下行为表现的实证分析研究。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  14. DefensesarXiv 2610.02432

    论文提出 LLM 输入扰动鲁棒性度量,并发布 ASA 攻击与 AttestMCP 防护

    提出 ASA 与 AttestMCP,度量并降低 LLM 对输入序列扰动的敏感

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Gemma-3-27B-Instruct, Gemma-3-4B-Instruct, Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct and others12
    Paper analysisRead analysis
  15. DefensesarXiv 2610.00883

    DeBERTa-ConPara:面向部署的 AI 生成文本检测,推理端 Unicode 归一化提升对抗鲁棒性

    提出推理时 Unicode 归一化的检测器,识别遭字符级扰动的 AI 生成文本

    Published
    Evaluated models
    microsoft/deberta-v3-large, deberta-v3-base, bert-large-cased and others4
    Abstract推理时归一化消除两类 Unicode 攻击,训练时归一化则会删掉对抗监督。

    DeBERTa-ConPara 是一个面向部署的 AI 文本检测器:DeBERTa-v3-large 在多数据集原始文本上训练,推理前做确定性 Unicode 归一化,用一个固定阈值面对没有目标域标签的场景。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  16. DefensesarXiv 2609.39548

    NDDL:用正常扩散动力学为文生图模型做后门防御

    提出 NDDL,用良性扩散轨迹检测文生图后门提示并定位触发 token

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Stable Diffusion v1.5, Stable Diffusion XL, Stable Diffusion v3.5 and others4
    AbstractNDDL 从良性扩散轨迹学习正常转移,用动态不一致检测后门并定位触发 token。

    NDDL 是面向文生图扩散模型的后门防御:防御者只有白盒模型访问和良性提示词,没有后门先验,需要区分后门提示词并找出触发 token。

    Paper analysisRead analysis