Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 12 · Monday
Another 265 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
提出 comprehension audits，以人类理解证据作为继续研发门槛
Published Oct 7 Abstract 理解审计把出示人类理解设为继续研发的门禁，并报告开源评审评论率下降。本文是一份研发过程保障提案：用 comprehension audits 检验责任人是否理解 AI 参与产生的研发贡献，未达标就暂停后续开发与依赖该贡献的发布。 。
系统梳理智能体执行链路中的越狱攻击与防御并比较推理时防御
Published Sep 11
Evaluated models Qwen3.5-4B , Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct Abstract SoK 将越狱重放到智能体流水线，并用两种模型检验回复层防御的边际与代价。Mia 等人把越狱安全从单轮回复扩展到智能体的规划、记忆、工具和智能体间通信，并问既有结论在更强原生对齐下是否还成立。
论证红队评测存在威胁模型覆盖缺口并用多语言探针验证
Published Sep 6
Evaluated models Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 提出面向意图的多轮 LLM 越狱分类体系
Published Aug 2
Evaluated models Llama-3 , Llama-3.3-70B , DeepSeek-V3 and others11 Abstract 作者用四维意图分类整理多轮越狱，并称组织方式影响效果与观察范围。这是一篇关于多轮 LLM 越狱的 SoK：按有害意图在交互中的组织位置分类，而不是按单步提示技巧分类。
You have reached the end