Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 9 papers

Another 227papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. DefensesarXiv 2610.02569

    Pincer:用数字分身学习用户偏好并执行动态最小权限

    为 Agent 提出资源层授权系统 Pincer,用数字分身执行动态最小权限

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude Haiku 4.5, Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
    AbstractPincer 在资源层以三票合取做授权。

    Pincer 是加在现成 coding agent 上的资源层授权防御:用只受用户侧信息影响的 digital twin 做动态最小权限,并与 tool-call 层防御并存。要处理的是用户维护策略带来的权限蠕变和授权疲劳,以及不学习用户策略的 tool-call 分类器。作者引述工作称 auto mode 会放行多数不安全操作,并认为推理代码或复杂 shell 的效果在这一层不实际。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2609.35659

    Tracekit:面向自主编码 Agent 的防篡改意图-推理-动作审计系统

    提出 Tracekit,审计编码 Agent 的意图、推理与动作并检测账本篡改

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude Code (claude -p, version 2.1), 独立评审(同一 CLI,无工具)
    AbstractTracekit 把意图、自述和动作写入可锚定的哈希链。

    Tracekit 是无第三方依赖的编码智能体审计层:把人类请求、模型自述和已执行动作并排写入可外部锚定的哈希链,执行前用正则门,事后用规则和独立模型互查。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. DefensesarXiv 2609.29647

    AgentKernel:面向 Agent 的可信原生操作系统内核

    提出 AgentKernel,用四支柱强制中介 Agent 的输入、工具与记忆

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractAgentKernel 是四支柱智能体 OS 设计,安全论证未附带实测数字。

    AgentKernel 是把安全做成组织原则的智能体 OS 架构,不是带跑分的攻防评测。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. DefensesarXiv 2606.24322

    Protecting LLM agent long-term memory from poisoning: tamper-evident, source-bound permissions and machine-checkable guarantees

    提出 TMA-NM,以写时来源绑定抵御 Agent 长期记忆投毒

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gpt-5-chat, gpt-4o-mini, claude-opus-4.1 and others8
    AbstractTMA-NM 用来源绑定的行动权限挡住记忆洗白。

    TMA-NM 把 LLM 智能体长期记忆的行动权限绑到写时来源,用来挡住跨会话记忆投毒。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. DefensesarXiv 2603.11619

    Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Threats in Autonomous LLM Agents

    Proposes a defense-in-depth aligned with the five stages to mitigate cross-stage threats to autonomous agents

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractThis is a lifecycle threat analysis and layered mitigation design for OpenClaw, with the cases serving as qualitative evidence.

    This is a lifecycle threat analysis of OpenClaw, accompanied by a set of layered mitigation designs. The problem addressed is: when autonomous agents connect instant messaging, persistent memory, third-party plugins, and high-privilege execution, attacks are no longer limited to single-turn jailbreaks but can compound across multiple stages from initialization to execution. The authors argue that defenses hardening only individual interfaces cannot stop such cross-temporal attacks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end