Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 23 papers

Another 215papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. DefensesarXiv 2610.09469

    Secure-CUA: Constraining the Impact of Untrusted Content in Computer-Use Agents

    提出 Secure-CUA,用动作事务约束计算机使用智能体的不可信影响

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 5, Gemini 3.8 Flash, GPT-5.6-Sol
    AbstractSecure-CUA 用每步事务约束不可信影响,良性 TSR 接近 Vanilla-CUA。

    Secure-CUA 要限制图形界面里不可信内容对 CUA 决策和 GUI 执行的影响,同时保留合法任务所需的不可信信息。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2610.05640

    Research reveals that the CaMeL defense fails in multi-agent systems and proposes multi-CaMeL

    提出 multi-CaMeL,在智能体调用边界隔离可信指令与非可信数据

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude Fable 5, GPT-5.5, GPT-4.1 and others6

    Abstract论文针对多智能体中单体防御不组合的边界清洗问题,提出 multi-CaMeL 协议彻底阻断了 MultiAgentDojo 上的注入攻击。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. DefensesarXiv 2610.03089

    COBRA: A Dual-LLM Architecture for Defending Computer-Using Agents Against Branch-Jumping Attacks

    提出 COBRA 双 LLM 架构,防御计算机使用 Agent 的分支转向攻击

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gpt-5, UI-TARS-1.5-7B, claude-sonnet-5 and others6

    Abstract提出分支转向防御架构 COBRA,通过事前能力约束与边界代理消除分支转向攻击并兼顾效用。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. DefensesarXiv 2609.35659

    Tracekit:面向自主编码 Agent 的防篡改意图-推理-动作审计系统

    提出 Tracekit,审计编码 Agent 的意图、推理与动作并检测账本篡改

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude Code (claude -p, version 2.1), 独立评审(同一 CLI,无工具)
    AbstractTracekit 把意图、自述和动作写入可锚定的哈希链。

    Tracekit 是无第三方依赖的编码智能体审计层:把人类请求、模型自述和已执行动作并排写入可外部锚定的哈希链,执行前用正则门,事后用规则和独立模型互查。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. DefensesarXiv 2609.05901

    KITA:为 LLM Agent 设计密钥隔离的阈值签名授权架构

    提出 KITA,把 Agent 批准绑定到规范动作的密钥隔离阈值签名

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractKITA 把隔离的阈值签名当作精确动作的执行条件,并测量门控、相关性与签名开销。

    KITA 是一套密钥隔离的阈值授权架构,用来把模型评审变成执行外部动作的条件。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. DefensesarXiv 2609.02786

    SafeEvolve:基于智能体经验的 Harness-Policy 协同演化安全对齐框架

    提出 SafeEvolve,用轨迹证据协同演化安全 harness 与策略

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3.5-4B, Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507, Qwen3.5-1.7B and others4
    AbstractSafeEvolve 用轨迹证据协同更新安全 harness 和策略,在两个 4B 模型的智能体安全基准上改变安全与效用。

    SafeEvolve 把已完成的 on-policy 轨迹变成安全 harness 的有界更新,并用两阶段 SFT-RL 把这些更新内化进工具使用策略。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. DefensesarXiv 2607.13716

    CAVA:面向智能体 AI 运行时治理的规范动作验证与证明

    提出 CAVA,将异构智能体运行时事件规范为可哈希动作并绑定审批与回执

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractCAVA 用规范动作指纹承接异构运行时治理。

    CAVA 是给异构智能体运行时用的动作语义层,用来回答“被批准和被审计的到底是哪一个动作”。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. DefensesarXiv 2603.12644

    Revealing security threats and defense architectures for autonomous agents: an OpenClaw case study

    Reviews threats to autonomous agents and proposes a full-lifecycle defense blueprint, FASA

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractUsing OpenClaw as an example, it divides risks into three layers and uses FASA to describe defense from input to system execution.

    This is a threat review and defense architecture report using OpenClaw as a case study, not a scored attack or defense evaluation.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. DefensesarXiv 2603.11619

    Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Threats in Autonomous LLM Agents

    Proposes a defense-in-depth aligned with the five stages to mitigate cross-stage threats to autonomous agents

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractThis is a lifecycle threat analysis and layered mitigation design for OpenClaw, with the cases serving as qualitative evidence.

    This is a lifecycle threat analysis of OpenClaw, accompanied by a set of layered mitigation designs. The problem addressed is: when autonomous agents connect instant messaging, persistent memory, third-party plugins, and high-privilege execution, attacks are no longer limited to single-turn jailbreaks but can compound across multiple stages from initialization to execution. The authors argue that defenses hardening only individual interfaces cannot stop such cross-temporal attacks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. DefensesarXiv 2602.10915

    Blind Gods and Broken Screens: Building a Secure, Intent-Centric Mobile Agent Operating System

    Proposes Aura, which uses a trusted kernel to mediate the identity, perception, and action control of mobile agents

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Gemini-3-Flash
    AbstractAura mediates structured interactions via the Agent Kernel.

    Aura uses kernel-mediated structured agent interaction, replacing screen-interface mobile assistants..

    Paper analysisRead analysis