Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 12 · Monday
Another 232 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
系统评估循环语言模型加深 loop 后的 CoT 可监控性
Published Oct 2
Evaluated models Ouro-1.4B-Thinking , Ouro-2.6B-Thinking , Nanbeige4.2-3B and others4 Abstract 加深 loop 可在部分压力测试任务降低可监测性,循环架构本身并不必然更难监测。这项工作评估 LoopLM 的 CoT 可监测性:加深共享层的重复次数,以及“有循环结构”本身,会不会让决策关键因素更少出现在可监测文本里。
提出自动化红队流水线,用系统提示词压测对齐审计能否抵御策略性欺骗
Published Feb 10
Evaluated models Gemma 2 9B Instruct , Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Abstract 通过红队提示词揭示现有审计方法易受策略欺骗,并在激活层面诱导高置信度错误推断。
You have reached the end