Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 16 papers

Another 240papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. DefensesarXiv 2610.11634

    LTBD:用可学习信任边界分隔符防御提示注入

    提出 LTBD,用可学习分隔符隔离可信指令与不可信数据

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama3-8B-Instruct, Llama3.1-8B-Instruct, Falcon3-7B-Instruct and others4
    AbstractLTBD 只训练四个分隔符嵌入。

    LTBD 是一种不改基座权重的提示注入防御:只学习用来标出可信指令与不可信数据边界的四个 token 嵌入。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2610.01349

    PACE:面向工具调用 LLM Agent 的来源感知能力强制执行

    提出 PACE,在工具调用前做路径隔离与效果授权

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gpt-5.6-luna, DeepSeek-V4-Flash, Qwen-3.8-27B
    AbstractPACE 在工具边界做路径割与效果核验。

    PACE 是面向工具调用型 LLM 智能体的运行时调解:当准入证据无法区分会改变行为的规格时,不在出口站点上撤销调解,而在最后一次工具调用前同时检查表示出的影响路径和请求权限。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. DefensesarXiv 2610.02569

    Pincer:用数字分身学习用户偏好并执行动态最小权限

    为 Agent 提出资源层授权系统 Pincer,用数字分身执行动态最小权限

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude Haiku 4.5, Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
    AbstractPincer 在资源层以三票合取做授权。

    Pincer 是加在现成 coding agent 上的资源层授权防御:用只受用户侧信息影响的 digital twin 做动态最小权限,并与 tool-call 层防御并存。要处理的是用户维护策略带来的权限蠕变和授权疲劳,以及不学习用户策略的 tool-call 分类器。作者引述工作称 auto mode 会放行多数不安全操作,并认为推理代码或复杂 shell 的效果在这一层不实际。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. DefensesarXiv 2609.22573

    研究提出面向企业 MCP 的零信任授权与工具发现方案

    提出企业 MCP 零信任授权与发现扩展,在架构上拒绝提示注入下的越权调用

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gpt-5, claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-opus-4-7 and others6
    Abstract同一份按工具声明同时管 MCP 的发现、列表和调用,使注入不能扩大已有凭证的权限。

    作者把零信任放在 MCP 工具调用边界:智能体即使被提示注入,也不能调用其凭证范围之外的工具。问题来自三点部署性质。调用意图会随不可信上下文改变。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. DefensesarXiv 2609.14631

    IntentCap 提出按任务意图限定 LLM Agent 权限的机制

    提出 IntentCap,按来源字段所有权合成并裁决 Agent 能力租约

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Abstract四源字段租约约束副作用。

    IntentCap 是把智能体能力绑到当前任务意图、并按上下文来源划分字段所有权的权限机制。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. DefensesarXiv 2606.24322

    Protecting LLM agent long-term memory from poisoning: tamper-evident, source-bound permissions and machine-checkable guarantees

    提出 TMA-NM,以写时来源绑定抵御 Agent 长期记忆投毒

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gpt-5-chat, gpt-4o-mini, claude-opus-4.1 and others8
    AbstractTMA-NM 用来源绑定的行动权限挡住记忆洗白。

    TMA-NM 把 LLM 智能体长期记忆的行动权限绑到写时来源,用来挡住跨会话记忆投毒。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. DefensesarXiv 2603.12644

    Revealing security threats and defense architectures for autonomous agents: an OpenClaw case study

    Reviews threats to autonomous agents and proposes a full-lifecycle defense blueprint, FASA

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractUsing OpenClaw as an example, it divides risks into three layers and uses FASA to describe defense from input to system execution.

    This is a threat review and defense architecture report using OpenClaw as a case study, not a scored attack or defense evaluation.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. DefensesarXiv 2602.20708

    ICON:基于推理时纠正的 Agent 间接提示注入防御

    提出推理时防御 ICON,探测注意力过聚焦并转向以纠正 Agent 间接提示注入

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Qwen-3-8B, Llama-3.1-8B, Mistral-8B and others6
    AbstractICON 在推理时检测过聚焦并转向,以兼顾 IPI 安全与任务效用。

    ICON 在推理时检测 IPI 的注意力过聚焦并转向,避免以拒答中止智能体轨迹。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. DefensesarXiv 2602.07918

    CausalArmor: Efficient Indirect Prompt Injection Guardrails via Causal Attribution

    提出间接提示注入护栏 CausalArmor,按因果归因选择性清洗未受信片段

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Gemini-2.5-Flash, Claude-4.0-Sonnet, Gemini-3-Pro and others4
    AbstractCausalArmor selectively sanitizes and masks chain of thought at privileged decisions based on attribution margins, to mitigate over-defense against IPI.

    CausalArmor is an indirect prompt injection defense middleware on tool-calling agents, used to avoid paying the utility and latency costs of always-on sanitization even when there is no attack.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end