Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 15 papers

Another 233papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. DefensesarXiv 2610.07657

    DEFER1 多智能体防御研究报告受控测试中的攻击成功率下降

    实现 DEFER,以确定性检查优先拦截多智能体流水线的内容攻击

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507, gpt-oss-120b, Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct and others5
    AbstractDEFER 把确定性检查放在 judge 之前。

    DEFER 用来测量多智能体授权流水线里,确定性规则在何处结束、LLM judge 从何处开始。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2610.00371

    FlowReview:以授权配对评测控制多智能体组合信息流

    提出 FlowReview,用授权配对与确定性提交门控控制多智能体组合信息流

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Sonnet 4.5, Haiku 4.5, Qwen3-32B and others5
    Abstract配对标准要求拒绝禁止使用并完成授权使用,FlowReview 把三项审查接到执行。

    这篇工作把多智能体安全写成一件必须同时成立的事:拦住组合信息所启用的禁止使用,并完成同一场景里任务所需的授权使用。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. DefensesarXiv 2609.30824

    基于加密绑定身份验证能力令牌协调分布式 AI 智能体的提案

    提出身份绑定且委托只衰减的能力令牌,用上下文外钱包约束智能体

    Published
    Abstract用只衰减的身份绑定令牌和上下文外钱包,约束代表人类行动的分布式智能体。

    代表人类行动的分布式智能体,需要一种不把密钥放进语言模型上下文的授权方式。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. DefensesarXiv 2609.17648

    多智能体 LLM 流水线中的信任传播与结构隔离

    用任务绑定令牌和策略预言机拦住多智能体流水线的未授权执行

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gemma4:31b-cloud
    Abstract结构性授权拦住了记忆投毒的未授权执行,持密钥时承重的是策略预言机。

    作者在一条会改写沙箱邮件库的四智能体流水线上,检查低权限失陷会不会变成未授权的真实动作。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. DefensesarXiv 2609.01677

    Skill-as-API:面向智能体软件工程的机密多智能体协作协议

    提出 Skill-as-API,隔离多智能体协作中的 skill 正文与系统提示词

    Published
    Abstract协议把 skill 正文留在所有者侧,四层限制发现内容、权限期限和注入拼接。

    Skill-as-API 是面向智能体软件工程的协调协议,用来在跨组织调用时把 skill 的代码和系统提示词留在所有者进程。作者针对三条威胁:经通道或命名空间抽取专有方法,用注入让被调用模型输出系统提示词,以及协作结束后权限继续保留。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. DefensesarXiv 2609.29647

    AgentKernel:面向 Agent 的可信原生操作系统内核

    提出 AgentKernel,用四支柱强制中介 Agent 的输入、工具与记忆

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractAgentKernel 是四支柱智能体 OS 设计,安全论证未附带实测数字。

    AgentKernel 是把安全做成组织原则的智能体 OS 架构,不是带跑分的攻防评测。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. DefensesarXiv 2606.24322

    Protecting LLM agent long-term memory from poisoning: tamper-evident, source-bound permissions and machine-checkable guarantees

    提出 TMA-NM,以写时来源绑定抵御 Agent 长期记忆投毒

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gpt-5-chat, gpt-4o-mini, claude-opus-4.1 and others8
    AbstractTMA-NM 用来源绑定的行动权限挡住记忆洗白。

    TMA-NM 把 LLM 智能体长期记忆的行动权限绑到写时来源,用来挡住跨会话记忆投毒。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. DefensesarXiv 2606.08234

    SciTrace:面向科学发现智能体的轨迹感知安全推理框架

    提出 SciTrace,为科学发现智能体加入跨阶段安全推理与工具轨迹核验

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct, DeepSeek-V3 and others4
    AbstractSciTrace 把安全推理织入科学智能体各阶段,在 SciSafetyBench 上提高安全指标并保持输出质量。

    SciTrace 是加在科学发现智能体流水线上的安全框架,不是再在各阶段出口放一个独立过滤器。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. DefensesarXiv 2603.11619

    Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Threats in Autonomous LLM Agents

    Proposes a defense-in-depth aligned with the five stages to mitigate cross-stage threats to autonomous agents

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractThis is a lifecycle threat analysis and layered mitigation design for OpenClaw, with the cases serving as qualitative evidence.

    This is a lifecycle threat analysis of OpenClaw, accompanied by a set of layered mitigation designs. The problem addressed is: when autonomous agents connect instant messaging, persistent memory, third-party plugins, and high-privilege execution, attacks are no longer limited to single-turn jailbreaks but can compound across multiple stages from initialization to execution. The authors argue that defenses hardening only individual interfaces cannot stop such cross-temporal attacks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. DefensesarXiv 2603.04474

    From Spark to Wildfire: Modeling and Mitigating Error Cascades in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaboration

    Proposing a lineage-graph governance layer to suppress error cascades in multi-agent collaboration

    Published
    AbstractA single seed can solidify into a false consensus along a fixed collaboration graph.

    The authors turn "small errors becoming collective false consensus" in LLM-MAS into a measurable propagation on a graph, and use a plug-in that only changes messages, not topology, to reduce the final infection.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. DefensesarXiv 2505.23559

    SafeScientist:让 LLM 智能体的科学发现具备风险意识

    提出 SafeScientist 四层监控,阻止科研智能体执行高风险或不伦理任务

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-3.5-turbo and others5
    Abstract四层监控加科研安全基准。

    SafeScientist 是带四层监控的科研智能体框架,并用 SciSafetyBench 评测科学场景中的任务安全。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end