Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 12 papers

Another 232papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. DefensesarXiv 2610.07657

    DEFER1 多智能体防御研究报告受控测试中的攻击成功率下降

    实现 DEFER,以确定性检查优先拦截多智能体流水线的内容攻击

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507, gpt-oss-120b, Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct and others5
    AbstractDEFER 把确定性检查放在 judge 之前。

    DEFER 用来测量多智能体授权流水线里,确定性规则在何处结束、LLM judge 从何处开始。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2610.02861

    论文提出在 Kubernetes 上保护 AI Agent 的七层纵深防御框架与参考架构

    提出 Kubernetes 运维智能体的七层纵深防御框架与参考架构

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Abstract把运维智能体当不可信租户,用七层控制在完全攻破假设下约束行动。

    把 Kubernetes 上的运维智能体当作不可信租户,在假定提示注入已完全控制其工具选择的前提下,用基础设施重建数据面与控制面的边界。要解决的是:智能体读日志、注解、工单或 MCP 工具描述时,这些内容可以变成它带着自身凭据执行的命令。模型对齐和分类器只降低概率。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. DefensesarXiv 2610.00371

    FlowReview:以授权配对评测控制多智能体组合信息流

    提出 FlowReview,用授权配对与确定性提交门控控制多智能体组合信息流

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Sonnet 4.5, Haiku 4.5, Qwen3-32B and others5
    Abstract配对标准要求拒绝禁止使用并完成授权使用,FlowReview 把三项审查接到执行。

    这篇工作把多智能体安全写成一件必须同时成立的事:拦住组合信息所启用的禁止使用,并完成同一场景里任务所需的授权使用。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. DefensesarXiv 2609.31282

    基于区块链的 Agentic AI 框架:面向安全软件供应链的资源优化与能耗感知

    提出 AttestChain,将供应链安全智能体报告签名上链并据此控制发布

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-class LLM
    AbstractAttestChain 将智能体报告与链上发布门控结合,现有证据来自受控合成构建的总体结果。

    AttestChain 是一个把 LLM 安全检查、智能体身份验证和许可链发布策略连接起来的软件供应链防御框架。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. DefensesarXiv 2609.17648

    多智能体 LLM 流水线中的信任传播与结构隔离

    用任务绑定令牌和策略预言机拦住多智能体流水线的未授权执行

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gemma4:31b-cloud
    Abstract结构性授权拦住了记忆投毒的未授权执行,持密钥时承重的是策略预言机。

    作者在一条会改写沙箱邮件库的四智能体流水线上,检查低权限失陷会不会变成未授权的真实动作。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. DefensesarXiv 2609.29647

    AgentKernel:面向 Agent 的可信原生操作系统内核

    提出 AgentKernel,用四支柱强制中介 Agent 的输入、工具与记忆

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractAgentKernel 是四支柱智能体 OS 设计,安全论证未附带实测数字。

    AgentKernel 是把安全做成组织原则的智能体 OS 架构,不是带跑分的攻防评测。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. DefensesarXiv 2608.21101

    ClawSentry:面向自主 LLM Agent 的渐进式多层安全监控网关

    提出 ClawSentry 多层监控网关,在技能准入和运行时拦截恶意技能与隐藏指令

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Codex/GPT-5.4, Codex/GPT-5.5, Claude Code/GLM-5.1 and others6
    AbstractClawSentry 用包准入、三级运行时门控和反绕过,压低 skill 攻击并保住干净任务。

    ClawSentry 是挂在智能体运行时之外的安全监督网关,用来同时盖住 skill 执行的多个生命周期边界,并把已被拒绝的效果记到会话里。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. DefensesarXiv 2606.24322

    Protecting LLM agent long-term memory from poisoning: tamper-evident, source-bound permissions and machine-checkable guarantees

    提出 TMA-NM,以写时来源绑定抵御 Agent 长期记忆投毒

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gpt-5-chat, gpt-4o-mini, claude-opus-4.1 and others8
    AbstractTMA-NM 用来源绑定的行动权限挡住记忆洗白。

    TMA-NM 把 LLM 智能体长期记忆的行动权限绑到写时来源,用来挡住跨会话记忆投毒。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. DefensesarXiv 2603.12644

    Revealing security threats and defense architectures for autonomous agents: an OpenClaw case study

    Reviews threats to autonomous agents and proposes a full-lifecycle defense blueprint, FASA

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractUsing OpenClaw as an example, it divides risks into three layers and uses FASA to describe defense from input to system execution.

    This is a threat review and defense architecture report using OpenClaw as a case study, not a scored attack or defense evaluation.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. DefensesarXiv 2603.11619

    Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Threats in Autonomous LLM Agents

    Proposes a defense-in-depth aligned with the five stages to mitigate cross-stage threats to autonomous agents

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractThis is a lifecycle threat analysis and layered mitigation design for OpenClaw, with the cases serving as qualitative evidence.

    This is a lifecycle threat analysis of OpenClaw, accompanied by a set of layered mitigation designs. The problem addressed is: when autonomous agents connect instant messaging, persistent memory, third-party plugins, and high-privilege execution, attacks are no longer limited to single-turn jailbreaks but can compound across multiple stages from initialization to execution. The authors argue that defenses hardening only individual interfaces cannot stop such cross-temporal attacks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end