Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 12 · Monday
Another 261 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
提出 multi-CaMeL，在智能体调用边界隔离可信指令与非可信数据
Published Oct 5
Evaluated models Claude Fable 5 , GPT-5.5 , GPT-4.1 and others6 Abstract 论文针对多智能体中单体防御不组合的边界清洗问题，提出 multi-CaMeL 协议彻底阻断了 MultiAgentDojo 上的注入攻击。
提出多智能体流水线的边界攻击，使对抗内容作为可信输入跨层传播
Published Aug 1
Evaluated models GPT-5-mini , Claude Sonnet 4.5 , Kimi K2.5 Abstract 缺边界校验使对抗内容跨智能体传播，作者称这是架构属性而非模型能力。作者把多智能体 LLM 流水线的对抗问题定义为缺少边界校验，并用生产轨迹和受控实验检查脆弱性来自架构还是骨干模型。中间输出未经验证就传给下游。作者认为，一旦某级接受对抗内容，后续智能体会把它当作可信输入。
You have reached the end