Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 6 papers
Filter3
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 262papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 262papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. MADBench:多智能体辩论安全性评测基准发布

    提出 MADBench,评测多智能体辩论是吸收还是放大对抗影响

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gpt-4o, GPT-5, GPT-6 Astra
    AbstractMADBench 显示辩论能吸收部分准确率攻击,同时放大未授权读写。

    MADBench 是一个评测多智能体辩论安全性的基准,用来看攻击是被辩论吸收还是被放大。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. ORBIT:基于 UK AISI Inspect 的多智能体安全评测框架

    提出 ORBIT 框架,评测多智能体防御对合谋等威胁的效果

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.4, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Qwen3-235B and others5

    AbstractORBIT 用六层配置比较多智能体防御,逐动作监控不迁移到合谋。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. 多智能体协同过滤系统的连接性攻击与防御研究

    复现 AgentCF 上的多智能体攻防并刻画连通性作用

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-235B-A22B, Claude Haiku 4.5, Mixtral 8×7B and others4
    Abstract连通性沿 k 与ρ改变攻防,且用户/物品与早期/稳态需要分开看。

    作者在 AgentCF 上研究连通性如何改变多智能体协同过滤的攻防,复现已有方法而不是提出新载荷。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. SafeScientist:让 LLM 智能体的科学发现具备风险意识

    提出 SafeScientist 四层监控,阻止科研智能体执行高风险或不伦理任务

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-3.5-turbo and others5
    Abstract四层监控加科研安全基准。

    SafeScientist 是带四层监控的科研智能体框架,并用 SciSafetyBench 评测科学场景中的任务安全。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end