Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 5 papers
Filter4
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 240papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 240papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. MADBench:多智能体辩论安全性评测基准发布

    提出 MADBench,评测多智能体辩论是吸收还是放大对抗影响

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gpt-4o, GPT-5, GPT-6 Astra
    AbstractMADBench 显示辩论能吸收部分准确率攻击,同时放大未授权读写。

    MADBench 是一个评测多智能体辩论安全性的基准,用来看攻击是被辩论吸收还是被放大。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2609.38270

    VirusCascade:劫持 LLM 推荐智能体的协同反思机制

    提出 VirusCascade,联合操纵商品描述与交互轨迹以劫持推荐智能体协同反思

    Published
    Evaluated models
    AgentCF, AgentSEQ, AgentRAG and others4
    Abstract作者把反思写回视为推广攻击入口,并用联合操纵和诊断探针研究其持续与传播。

    VirusCascade 是针对推荐智能体协作反思的 black-box targeted promotion 攻击研究。 攻击者只改商品描述和少量账号的普通交互,试图让目标商品获得更多良性用户曝光。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. Emergence World:对长时程多智能体系统开展对抗压力测试

    提出 Emergence World,对长时程多智能体系统开展对抗压力测试

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, DeepSeek v4 Pro, Gemini 3.5 Flash and others9

    Abstract作者通过长期平行世界实验指出模型对齐不具备可组合性,单模型群体会产生社会奉承、协同退缩及语言不透明等失效。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2608.00718

    研究揭示多智能体 LLM 流水线的结构性漏洞

    提出多智能体流水线的边界攻击,使对抗内容作为可信输入跨层传播

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5-mini, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Kimi K2.5
    Abstract缺边界校验使对抗内容跨智能体传播,作者称这是架构属性而非模型能力。

    作者把多智能体 LLM 流水线的对抗问题定义为缺少边界校验,并用生产轨迹和受控实验检查脆弱性来自架构还是骨干模型。中间输出未经验证就传给下游。作者认为,一旦某级接受对抗内容,后续智能体会把它当作可信输入。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. DefensesarXiv 2603.04474

    From Spark to Wildfire: Modeling and Mitigating Error Cascades in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaboration

    Proposing a lineage-graph governance layer to suppress error cascades in multi-agent collaboration

    Published
    AbstractA single seed can solidify into a false consensus along a fixed collaboration graph.

    The authors turn "small errors becoming collective false consensus" in LLM-MAS into a measurable propagation on a graph, and use a plug-in that only changes messages, not topology, to reduce the final infection.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end