Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 20 papers

Another 233papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. DefensesarXiv 2610.07657

    DEFER1 多智能体防御研究报告受控测试中的攻击成功率下降

    实现 DEFER,以确定性检查优先拦截多智能体流水线的内容攻击

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507, gpt-oss-120b, Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct and others5
    AbstractDEFER 把确定性检查放在 judge 之前。

    DEFER 用来测量多智能体授权流水线里,确定性规则在何处结束、LLM judge 从何处开始。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2610.04412

    论文研究 LLM 数字孪生参与增强民主时的提示注入脆弱性

    提出检测、结构化与 GSPO 流程,降低共识生成的提示注入错位

    Published
    Evaluated models
    LLaMA-2 7B, LLaMA-3 8B, GPT 3.5 Turbo and others14
    Abstract三章依次做个体偏好预测、政党知识图谱审议,以及共识生成对提示注入的脆弱性与一条防御流程。

    这是一篇把 LLM 数字孪生放进增强民主的博士论文,分个体表示、政党聚合和共识生成的提示注入三章。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2609.39788

    研究:多智能体系统潜在通信链路可被训练用于提升有害顺从

    提出只训练或篡改多智能体潜在通信链路来提高有害遵从

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct, Gemma-3-1B-IT and others7
    Abstract潜在链路本身即可改变冻结智能体系统的安全,奖励既能攻击也能修复。

    学习得到的潜在通信链路会改变由冻结、对齐智能体组成的系统是否遵从有害请求。。作者研究三种拓扑:双智能体、三级顺序协作,以及双专家加汇总。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. MADBench:多智能体辩论安全性评测基准发布

    提出 MADBench,评测多智能体辩论是吸收还是放大对抗影响

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gpt-4o, GPT-5, GPT-6 Astra
    AbstractMADBench 显示辩论能吸收部分准确率攻击,同时放大未授权读写。

    MADBench 是一个评测多智能体辩论安全性的基准,用来看攻击是被辩论吸收还是被放大。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2609.38270

    VirusCascade:劫持 LLM 推荐智能体的协同反思机制

    提出 VirusCascade,联合操纵商品描述与交互轨迹以劫持推荐智能体协同反思

    Published
    Evaluated models
    AgentCF, AgentSEQ, AgentRAG and others4
    Abstract作者把反思写回视为推广攻击入口,并用联合操纵和诊断探针研究其持续与传播。

    VirusCascade 是针对推荐智能体协作反思的 black-box targeted promotion 攻击研究。 攻击者只改商品描述和少量账号的普通交互,试图让目标商品获得更多良性用户曝光。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. ORBIT:基于 UK AISI Inspect 的多智能体安全评测框架

    提出 ORBIT 框架,评测多智能体防御对合谋等威胁的效果

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.4, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Qwen3-235B and others5

    AbstractORBIT 用六层配置比较多智能体防御,逐动作监控不迁移到合谋。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2609.22711

    UBA-ORL:针对离线强化学习的遗忘激活后门攻击

    提出 UBA-ORL,以 BD/CM 样本在遗忘后激活离线 RL 后门

    Published
    Evaluated models
    TD3+BC, BCQ, IQL
    AbstractUBA-ORL 用竞争的 BD/CM 样本,使离线 RL 后门在删除伪装轨迹后激活。

    UBA-ORL 研究离线强化学习中由合规轨迹删除激活的后门:合法贡献者同时上传共享触发的后门轨迹和伪装轨迹,训练后触发响应被压低,删除伪装批次后再升高。受害系统是使用静态数据集和轨迹级遗忘接口的离线 RL 服务。对手不能看到训练算法、参数、梯度或具体遗忘算法,但能提交可区分批次,并在部署时向观测注入预定触发。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. AttacksarXiv 2606.09499

    研究者提出针对世界模型的机器人学习管线投毒攻击

    提出 VPH 与 VTH,只改视频帧劫持世界模型并投毒下游策略

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Cosmos-Predict 2.5, Cosmos-Predict 2.5 AC, Dino WM and others4
    Abstract只改视频帧经世界模型投毒。

    只改看似安全的视频帧,经世界模型之后才改变下游机器人策略。 问题在于世界模型进入数据生成后,数据集检查看到的仍是安全演示,合成轨迹却可以变危险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. DefensesarXiv 2606.08234

    SciTrace:面向科学发现智能体的轨迹感知安全推理框架

    提出 SciTrace,为科学发现智能体加入跨阶段安全推理与工具轨迹核验

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct, DeepSeek-V3 and others4
    AbstractSciTrace 把安全推理织入科学智能体各阶段,在 SciSafetyBench 上提高安全指标并保持输出质量。

    SciTrace 是加在科学发现智能体流水线上的安全框架,不是再在各阶段出口放一个独立过滤器。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. AttacksarXiv 2604.03890

    From prompts to physical actions: structured backdoor attacks against LLM-mediated robot control systems

    Propose a structured JSON backdoor that triggers malicious actions in robot control via a poisoned LoRA

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Gemma-2-9B-IT, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B and others4

    Abstract推理层后门传不到执行。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. DefensesarXiv 2603.04474

    From Spark to Wildfire: Modeling and Mitigating Error Cascades in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaboration

    Proposing a lineage-graph governance layer to suppress error cascades in multi-agent collaboration

    Published
    AbstractA single seed can solidify into a false consensus along a fixed collaboration graph.

    The authors turn "small errors becoming collective false consensus" in LLM-MAS into a measurable propagation on a graph, and use a plug-in that only changes messages, not topology, to reduce the final infection.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. AttacksarXiv 2603.01414

    Jailbreaking embodied LLMs via action-level manipulation

    Propose Blindfold, jailbreaking embodied LLMs with action-level manipulation

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B, DeepSeek-R1-14B, Gemma-3-27B and others8
    AbstractBlindfold jailbreaks embodied LLMs with action-level proxy planning, and the authors claim it can bypass semantic checks and is effective in both simulation and real-world settings.

    Blindfold is a no-box attack against embodied LLM planning modules, rewriting malicious intent into seemingly benign action sequences.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  13. AttacksarXiv 2603.00131

    Thought Virus:多 Agent 系统中潜意识提示引发的病毒式失准

    提出 Thought Virus,经潜意识提示使偏好沿多 Agent 消息传播

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
    AbstractThought Virus 把单点偏差传到下游。

    Thought Virus 把 subliminal prompting 放进多智能体通信,看单点偏差会不会在不点名目标概念时传到全网。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  14. AttacksarXiv 2601.13612

    PINA:针对导航智能体的提示注入攻击

    提出 PINA,迭代优化针对导航智能体的提示注入

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4, Balcı et al. [2]
    AbstractPINA 在黑盒下优化导航提示注入。

    PINA 是面向基于 LLM 的导航智能体、在黑盒条件下优化提示注入的框架。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  15. DefensesarXiv 2505.23559

    SafeScientist:让 LLM 智能体的科学发现具备风险意识

    提出 SafeScientist 四层监控,阻止科研智能体执行高风险或不伦理任务

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-3.5-turbo and others5
    Abstract四层监控加科研安全基准。

    SafeScientist 是带四层监控的科研智能体框架,并用 SciSafetyBench 评测科学场景中的任务安全。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end